| |
Low-Frequency HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations and Risk of NNRTI-Based Antiretroviral Treatment Failure
|
| |
| |
A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
"presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants was associated with more than twice the risk of virologic failure....Patients with drug-resistant minority variants as well as suboptimal medication adherence had a 10-fold risk of virologic failure compared with those with wild-type virus and excellent adherence..... these findings provide rationalefor developing standardized clinical assays for the detection of NNRTI-resistant minority variants "
JAMA May 4 2011
Jonathan Z. Li, MD Roger Paredes, MD, PhD Heather J. Ribaudo, PhD Evguenia S. Svarovskaia, PhD Karin J. Metzner, MD Michael J. Kozal, MD Kathy Huppler Hullsiek, PhD Melanie Balduin, PhD Martin R. Jakobsen, PhD, Msc Anna Maria Geretti, MD, PhD Rodolphe Thiebaut, MD, PhD Lars Ostergaard, MD, PhD Bernard Masquelier, PharmD, PhD Jeffrey A. Johnson, PhD Michael D. Miller, PhD Daniel R. Kuritzkes, MD
"It has been proposed that drug-resistant minority variants present at extremely low levels may not have significant clinical effects......In this pooled analysis, we found that the presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants was associated with more than twice the risk of virologic failure in patients receiving an initial NNRTI-based ART regimen in an analysis that controlled for medication adherence, race/ethnicity, baseline CD4 cell count, and baseline HIV-1 viral load. The presence of minority variants was associated with 2.5 to 3 times the risk of virologic failure at high and low levels of medication adherence. The association of minority variants with virologic failure was dose-dependent and most prominent in participants with NNRTI resistance mutations."
"Patients with drug-resistant minority variants as well as suboptimal medication adherence had a 10-fold risk of virologic failure compared with those with wild-type virus and excellent adherence. However, optimal medication adherence did not completely compensate for the higher risk of virologic failure in the presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants."
"In a pooled analysis, low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations, particularly involving NNRTI resistance, were significantly associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of virologic failure with first-line ART......The increased risk of virologic failure was most strongly associated with NNRTI-resistant minority variants (HR, 2.6......the presence of minority variants at 1% or greater conferred a significantly higher risk of virologic failure compared with minority variants present at less than 1% (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.0-4.9]; P = .048). Similar results were observed when the proportion of resistance variants in the virus population was stratified as less than 0.5% vs 0.5% or greater (P = .01 for comparison of <0.5% vs ≥0.5%) (Figure 3)......In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the presence of a drug-resistant minority variant (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.7-3.3]; P < .001) (Figure 3), overall medication adherence (HR, 0.86 per 5% higher adherence [95% CI, 0.83-0.88]; P < .001), and race/ethnicity were all significant independent predictors of virologic failure. Compared with white participants, those of black, Hispanic, and other races/ethnicities all had an increased risk of virologic failure"
"Drug-resistant minority variants detected by ultrasensitive assays could arise from a few sources. Those found at higher proportions may represent transmitted drug resistance that have been replaced by wild-type revertants over time34 or have resulted from multivariant transmission,35 ,36 whereas mutations present at extremely low frequencies (much less than 1% of the viral population) could be attributable to de novo mutations resulting from errors introduced during viral replication37 or laboratory artifacts from reverse transcription and PCR amplification. The presence of spontaneously appearing low-frequency drug resistance mutations has been described in HIV-1 samples collected in the pre-ART drug era."
"Using the most sensitive test for NNRTI resistance mutations, approximately 11 patients would need to be screened prior to initiating an NNRTI based ART regimen to avoid 1 case of virologic failure. These data provide a rationale for developing standardized clinical assays for the detection of NNRTI-resistant minority variants. Because NNRTI-based regimens are the most commonly prescribed first-line antiretroviral therapy, the clinical use of ultrasensitive screening for drug-resistant HIV could help identify individuals at greatest risk of virologic failure and allow ART to be tailored appropriately."
Abstract
Context Presence of low-frequency, or minority, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations may adversely affect response to antiretroviral treatment (ART), but evidence regarding the effects of such mutations on the effectiveness of first-line ART is conflicting.
Objective To evaluate the association of preexisting drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants with risk of first-line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral virologic failure.
Data Sources Systematic review of published and unpublished studies in PubMed (1966 through December 2010), EMBASE (1974 through December 2010), conference abstracts, and article references. Authors of all studies were contacted for detailed laboratory, ART, and adherence data.
Study Selection and Data Abstraction Studies involving ART-naive participants initiating NNRTI-based regimens were included. Participants were included if all drugs in their ART regimen were fully active by standard HIV drug resistance testing. Cox proportional hazard models using pooled patient-level data were used to estimate the risk of virologic failure based on a Prentice weighted case-cohort analysis stratified by study.
Data Synthesis Individual data from 10 studies and 985 participants were available for the primary analysis. Low-frequency drug resistance mutations were detected in 187 participants, including 117 of 808 patients in the cohort studies. Low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations were associated with an increased risk of virologic failure (hazard ratio (HR], 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.7-3.3]; P < .001) after controlling for medication adherence, race/ethnicity, baseline CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. Increased risk of virologic failure was most strongly associated with minority variants resistant to NNRTIs (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; P < .001). Among participants from the cohort studies, 35% of those with detectable minority variants experienced virologic failure compared with 15% of those without minority variants. The presence of minority variants was associated with 2.5 to 3 times the risk of virologic failure at either 95% or greater or less than 95% overall medication adherence. A dose-dependent increased risk of virologic failure was found in participants with a higher proportion or quantity of drug-resistant variants.
Conclusion In a pooled analysis, low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations, particularly involving NNRTI resistance, were significantly associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of virologic failure with first-line ART.
Genotypic tests for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and population sequencing techniques that detect resistance-associated mutations present in at least 15% to 25% of the viral population.1 ,2 Using these traditional assays, the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance mutations is estimated to be between 8% and 16% among HIV-1 infected persons in North America and Europe.3 ,4 These assays fail to detect the presence of low-frequency, or minority, drug resistance mutations within the population of HIV-1 quasispecies in an infected individual. Compared with standard population sequencing, a number of ultrasensitive assays, including allele-specific PCR and deep sequencing, can detect mutations present at a far lower frequency.5 ,6,7 Presence of these minority variants may adversely affect the response to antiretroviral treatment (ART), but their clinical significance continues to be the subject of considerable debate and uncertainty.
Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens are the most popular first-line HIV-1 treatment regimens, both in the United States and worldwide.8,9 ,10 Although success rates are high, further improvements in tailoring regimens to resistance genotypes would avoid the costs associated with treatment failure and the accumulation of additional drug resistance mutations. A number of studies have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of baseline low-frequency NNRTI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) resistance mutations on the rates of treatment failure associated with the initial ART regimen. Results of these studies have been mixed, with some showing that drug-resistant minority variants significantly increase the risk of treatment failure and others showing no significant effect. In contrast, the small number of studies that evaluated the importance of low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations on integrase- and protease inhibitor-based treatment regimens have generally failed to find a significant association with increased risk of treatment failure.11 ,12,13 ,14,15 ,16
We performed a systematic review of the literature and a pooled analysis to examine the relationship between the presence of baseline low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations and the risk of virologic failure with NNRTI-based regimens in treatment-naive adults.
RESULTS
Systematic Review and Baseline Characteristics
In total, 10 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.15 ,16,17 ,18,19 ,20,21 ,22,23 ,24 The qualifying studies included 6 cohort studies,15 ,16,17 ,18,19 ,20 3 case-control studies,22 ,23,24 and 1 case-cohort study21 (Table 1). Of 1263 patients, 985 were included in the primary Cox proportional hazard analysis. At baseline, the mean age of the entire study population was 38 years, and 83% were men. The median CD4 cell count was 229 (interquartile range, [IQR], 125-324) cells/mm3, and median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 5.0 (IQR, 4.6-5.4) log10 copies/mL.
All studies evaluated the presence of K103N (Table 2). Other commonly evaluated minority variants included Y181C (n = 435) and the NRTI resistance mutations M184V (n = 228) and K65R (n = 163). Most studies used allele-specific real-time PCR to detect minority variants; 1 study used the HIV-SNaPshot assay,18 and 1 used ultradeep pyrosequencing (Roche/454 Life Sciences, Branford, Connecticut).15 The study that used deep sequencing detected additional NNRTI-resistant minority variants (G190A, K101E, and P225H) in 3 patients, who were also included in the analysis. The lower limit of detection of minority variants differed widely between assays, with an upper range of 2% for the HIV-SNaPshot assay and a lower range of 0.003% for 1 of the allele-specific PCR assays (Table 2). The assays for 3 studies were unable to quantify the percentage of minority variants present.18 ,22,23 No significant heterogeneity was seen among studies (P = .77), but there was evidence of limited publication bias (eFigure).
Drug-resistant minority variants were found in 187 participants, including 117 of 808 patients (14%) in the cohort studies.15,16 ,17,18 ,19,20 ,21 Patients with minority variants had a baseline median HIV-1 RNA level of 4.79 (IQR, 4.4-5.4) log10 copies/mL compared to 4.95 (IQR, 4.6-5.4) log10 copies/mL for those without detectable minority variants (P = .49). Patients with drug-resistant minority variants had lower CD4 cell counts than those in whom these variants were not detected (median, 208 [IQR, 50-330] cells/mm3 vs 234 [IQR, 134-329] cells/mm3, respectively; P = .03). Patients with or without virologic failure had no significant differences in either baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels (median, 5.0 [IQR, 4.6-5.5] log10 copies/mL vs 5.0 [IQR, 4.6-5.4] log10 copies/mL, respectively; P = .90) or CD4 cell counts (median, 222 [IQR, 87-325] cells/mm3 vs 235 [IQR, 135-324] cells/mm3, respectively; P = .47). Among participants in the cohort studies, the proportion of those harboring drug-resistant HIV minority variants did not differ significantly by race/ethnicity (P = .13).
Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Minority Variants and Increased Risk of Virologic Failure
The presence of any NNRTI- or NRTI-resistant minority variant was associated with an increased risk of virologic failure (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.9-3.5]; P < .001). This result was still apparent when the study contributing the largest number of patients with virologic failure21 was excluded (HR, 3.6 [95% CI, 1.9-6.9]; P < .001) and when the analysis was restricted to include only participants from cohort studies (HR, 3.7 [95% CI, 2.3-5.9]; P < .001) (Figure 2). Specifically, among the 808 participants from cohort studies, 35% of those with detectable minority variants experienced virologic failure compared with 15% of those without minority variants. A sensitivity analysis that included only the largest cohort studies15,20 ,21 gave similar results, with a virologic failure rate of 40% in participants with minority variants vs 17% in those without (HR, 3.9 [95% CI, 2.3-6.4]; P < .001 [n = 665]).
The increased risk of virologic failure was most strongly associated with NNRTI-resistant minority variants (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; P < .001) (Figure 3). The presence of only NRTI-resistant minority variants was not associated with a significantly increased risk of virologic failure (HR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.1-17.7]), but only 9 participants fell into this category. In participants with NNRTI-resistant minority variants, the overall failure rate among those in the cohort studies was 37% compared to 15% in those without detectable minority variants (HR, 3.8 [95% CI, 2.4-6.1]; P < .001). No significant difference was found for the effect of NNRTI-resistant minority variants on the risk of virologic failure with efavirenz- vs nevirapine-based regimens (P = .90 for interaction) (Figure 3). There also was no significant difference in the rate of virologic failure between participants with K103N compared with Y181C minority variants (HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.4-1.4]; P = .34) among the subset of patients in whom testing for both mutations was performed (n = 432).
Given the virologic failure rates for patients with and without NNRTI-resistant minority variants (37% and 15%, respectively, over a median 31-month follow-up period) and using the most sensitive resistance test,21 approximately 11 patients would need to be screened prior to initiating an NNRTI-based ART regimen to avoid 1 case of virologic failure.
Medication Adherence and Minority Variants
Participants with drug-resistant minority variants and 95% or greater medication adherence had a significantly lower risk of virologic failure compared with those with minority variants and less than 95% adherence (HR, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.2-0.4]; P < .001). Compared with all participants without minority variants, individuals with minority variants and less than 95% medication adherence had 5.1 times the risk of virologic failure (95% CI, 3.6-7.2; P < .001). Those with minority variants and 95% or greater adherence had 1.5 times the risk of virologic failure (95% CI, 0.98-2.3; P = .06) (Figure 3). When compared with participants with 95% or greater adherence and no minority variants, both suboptimal adherence and the presence of minority variants were associated with similarly increased risks of virologic failure (HR, 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-5.8]; P < .001 and HR, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.9-5.0]; P < .001, respectively) (Figure 3). The combined presence of suboptimal medication adherence and drug-resistant minority variants resulted in a substantially increased risk of virologic failure (HR, 10.6 [95% CI, 6.9-16.4]; P < .001). Furthermore, within each adherence category, the presence of minority variants was associated with an increased risk of virologic failure (HR for ≥95% adherence, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.9-5.0]; P < .001 and HR for <95% adherence, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.8-3.8]; P < .001).
Dose-Dependent Association of Drug-Resistant Minority Variants With Increased Risk of Virologic Failure
To evaluate whether a threshold existed for the effect of drug-resistant minority variants, analyses were performed to explore the risk of virologic failure associated with different percentages or absolute numbers of drug-resistant minority variants. Compared with participants without drug-resistant minority variants, an increased risk of virologic failure was found when drug-resistant minority variants were present at either less than 1% or 1% or greater of the viral population (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.6-3.1]; P < .001 and HR, 5.0 [95% CI, 2.4-10.3]; P < .001, respectively) (Figure 3). However, the presence of minority variants at 1% or greater conferred a significantly higher risk of virologic failure compared with minority variants present at less than 1% (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.0-4.9]; P = .048). Similar results were observed when the proportion of resistance variants in the virus population was stratified as less than 0.5% vs 0.5% or greater (P = .01 for comparison of <0.5% vs ≥0.5%) (Figure 3). A dose-dependent effect on the risk of virologic failure was found when participants were categorized as having 0, 1 through 9, 10 through 99, 100 through 999, and 1000 or more copies of drug-resistant minority variants per milliliter of plasma (Figure 3). The effect on virologic failure was similar when the analysis was limited to only NNRTI-resistant minority variants (eAppendix).
Multivariate Analysis
In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, the presence of a drug-resistant minority variant (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.7-3.3]; P < .001) (Figure 3), overall medication adherence (HR, 0.86 per 5% higher adherence [95% CI, 0.83-0.88]; P < .001), and race/ethnicity were all significant independent predictors of virologic failure. Compared with white participants, those of black, Hispanic, and other races/ethnicities all had an increased risk of virologic failure (HR, 2.8 [95% CI, 2.0-3.8]; P < .001; HR, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.4-3.1]; P < .001; and HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.0-6.5]; P = .045, respectively). Associations with baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were not detected (P = .59 and P = .88, respectively).
Time to Virologic Suppression
The effect of drug-resistant minority variants on viral decay dynamics was evaluated using 2 studies with frequent plasma HIV-1 RNA determinations after ART initiation (n = 581).20,21 The proportion of participants who never reached a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of 200 copies/mL or less was significantly higher in the group with drug-resistant minority variants compared with those without detectable minority variants (9% vs 1%, respectively; P < .001). However, among participants who eventually demonstrated suppressed viral replication, there was no difference in the median number of days to virologic suppression (57 vs 57 days, respectively) (Figure 4).
COMMENT
In this pooled analysis, we found that the presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants was associated with more than twice the risk of virologic failure in patients receiving an initial NNRTI-based ART regimen in an analysis that controlled for medication adherence, race/ethnicity, baseline CD4 cell count, and baseline HIV-1 viral load. The presence of minority variants was associated with 2.5 to 3 times the risk of virologic failure at high and low levels of medication adherence. The association of minority variants with virologic failure was dose-dependent and most prominent in participants with NNRTI resistance mutations.
Multiple factors contribute to the risk of ART failure. Adherence to antiretroviral therapy is a major predictor of viral suppression and disease progression.28,29 ,30 In this analysis, we found that the risk of virologic failure associated with the presence of drug-resistant minority variants was similar to that conferred by suboptimal medication adherence. Patients with drug-resistant minority variants as well as suboptimal medication adherence had a 10-fold risk of virologic failure compared with those with wild-type virus and excellent adherence. However, optimal medication adherence did not completely compensate for the higher risk of virologic failure in the presence of drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants.
Interestingly, race/ethnicity was found to be a significant predictor of virologic failure; in particular, white participants had a lower risk of virologic failure compared with black and Hispanic participants. This risk differential was not attributable to differing rates of minority variant detection. While some studies have shown no association of race/ethnicity or HIV-1 subtype with initial treatment response,31 a secondary analysis of the A5095 trial uncovered an interaction between race/ethnicity and adherence and found a greater effect of nonadherence on virologic failure in black participants.32
The effect of race/ethnicity on virologic failure seen in our analysis was present even after adjusting for the level of medication adherence. The relationship between race/ethnicity and virologic failure may be mediated by factors such as socioeconomic status, drug and alcohol use, or other factors not accounted for here that may correlate with adherence and could contribute to residual confounding. Another potential explanation for these findings could be related to the recent report that cytochrome P450 polymorphisms affect NNRTI pharmacokinetics and treatment outcome in a race/ethnicity-specific manner.33
Drug-resistant minority variants detected by ultrasensitive assays could arise from a few sources. Those found at higher proportions may represent transmitted drug resistance that have been replaced by wild-type revertants over time34 or have resulted from multivariant transmission,35 ,36 whereas mutations present at extremely low frequencies (much less than 1% of the viral population) could be attributable to de novo mutations resulting from errors introduced during viral replication37 or laboratory artifacts from reverse transcription and PCR amplification. The presence of spontaneously appearing low-frequency drug resistance mutations has been described in HIV-1 samples collected in the pre-ART drug era.7
It has been proposed that drug-resistant minority variants present at extremely low levels may not have significant clinical effects. While we found a dose-dependent effect of drug-resistant minority variants on risk of virologic failure, an increased risk was detected even at very low minority variant frequencies (<0.5% and 10-99 copies/mL). A recent study reported a strong correlation between virologic failure and the presence of 2000 copies/mL or more of K103N-containing HIV-1, whereas patients with fewer than 2000 copies/mL of K103N did not show an increased risk of virologic failure.20
One explanation for the difference between these results and those of the current analysis is that the earlier study used an assay with a limit of detection for drug-resistant minority variants of 0.5% of the virus population and therefore identified only a limited number of participants with resistance variants present at low copy numbers. Other possible explanations include the lack of Y181C measurement in that study and differences between studies of the NRTI component of the regimen. Nevertheless, it is clear that not all patients in whom drug-resistant minority variants are identified will experience virologic failure, and a frequency-dependent effect of the population with such variants is clearly evident from the current pooled analysis. Further research is needed to identify additional factors that contribute to the risk of virologic failure.
This analysis has several limitations. To combine patient-level data from studies with different study designs, statistical adjustments were required such as limiting the inclusion of patients from case-control studies to include only those patients with virologic failure and using a stratified Cox proportional hazard model in which patients with virologic failure outside of the cohort studies were only included at the time of failure. This approach has been validated in prior studies,25,26 but we also confirmed the robustness of our findings in sensitivity analyses limited to data obtained from the cohort studies.
In addition, studies that contributed data to this analysis had differences with regard to assay methodology, sensitivity, and resistance mutations detected. The assay with the highest limit of detection was the HIV-SNaPshot assay (2%),18 whereas allele-specific PCR assays had lower limits of detection (down to 0.003%). The study that contributed the second-largest number of participants and the largest proportion of virologic failures used the most sensitive assay.21 As expected, patients from that study made up the greatest proportion of those with drug-resistant minority variants (72%). Nevertheless, reanalysis of the data excluding the contribution from this study found that the increased risk of virologic failure associated with presence of drug-resistant minority variants persisted. Visual inspection of the Kaplan-Meier curves (Figure 2) suggests that the increased risk of virologic failure associated with minority variants may be most prominent early in the course of treatment. Such a result would not be unexpected and would mean that the hazard ratios presented (which represent the average hazard ratio over the entire study period) may underestimate the effect of drug-resistant minority variants during the early treatment period.
Another limitation relates to the specific drug resistance mutations studied. All studies measured the levels of K103N, but only 6 studies evaluated the presence of Y181C (44% of total patients), and only a small proportion of the total study population was tested for the presence of M184V (23%) or K65R (17%). Consequently, our ability to detect a significant association of NRTI resistance mutations and risk of virologic failure or a difference in effect between K103N and Y181C minority variants was limited. Because only a subset of participants were tested for the presence of other NNRTI resistance mutations, our results most likely underestimate the effect of NNRTI-resistant minority variants on virologic failure, because a significant proportion of those categorized as having no detectable minority variants may have had unmeasured Y181C or other NNRTI resistance mutations.
The findings of this pooled analysis demonstrate that low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations, and NNRTI resistance mutations in particular, confer a greater than 2-fold risk of virologic failure in treatment-naive individuals initiating a first-line NNRTI-containing ART regimen. Using the most sensitive test for NNRTI resistance mutations, approximately 11 patients would need to be screened prior to initiating an NNRTI based ART regimen to avoid 1 case of virologic failure. These data provide a rationale for developing standardized clinical assays for the detection of NNRTI-resistant minority variants. Because NNRTI-based regimens are the most commonly prescribed first-line antiretroviral therapy, the clinical use of ultrasensitive screening for drug-resistant HIV could help identify individuals at greatest risk of virologic failure and allow ART to be tailored appropriately.
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
