Report on Selected Late Breakers at Lisbon European AIDS Conference
By Jules Levin, NATAP
In the final session today from 10:30 am to 12 noon, researchers
reported late breakers.
1. Nevirapine in high viral loads
2. PMPA
3. Combination therapy in pregnant women and their newborns
4. Switching from PI to NVP Regimen in HIV+ Subjects under
long-term successful treatment
5. Using therapeutic drug monitoring with genotypic testing to
evaluate PI pharmacokinetics
6. IL-2 for those with low CD4s despite effective HAART
Lisbon is a pleasant and large city. I went into 2 pharmacies in
Lisbon and asked if they carried HIV drugs. They both told me you
can only get drugs at hospital. I met a doctor from Taiwan at the
conference who told me that there are 2700 people with HIV in
Taiwan. And that the government supplies HIV therapy for them.
Tomorrow morning I head home.
---------------------
Nevirapine Antiviral Activity in High Viral Loads
Richard Pollard, from the University of Texas Medical Center,
reported on a sub-study of a larger international study of about
2,200 patients (Boerhinger Ingelheim 1090 study). The
larger study was a randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical
endpoint study looking at AIDS progression events or death. In
the larger study treatment-naïve and experienced patients were
randomized to NVP with NRTIs including 3TC or NRTIs alone
including 3TC.
The sub-study looked only at individuals who were treatment-naïve
or had less than 28 days of any anti-retroviral therapy, They all
received NVP+AZT/3TC or AZT/3TC with NVP placebo. In the
sub-study they evaluated the NVP triple regimen in high viral
load patients. About 80% of participants were from South Africa
so about 55% were black and 41% white. Mean age was 35 years.
The sub-study is concerned with 154 more advanced patients:
median 85 CD4s and 5.3 log viral load at baseline (194,000
copies/ml). In the NVP arm (n=74), 54% had above 100,000
copies/ml, 45% had above 200,000 and 32% had above 500,000. In
the NVP placebo arm (n=80), 68% had above 100,000, 38% had above
250,000 and 23% had above 500,000. 58% (n=90) of patients had
above 100,000 copies/ml, and 75% (n=115) had above 50,000.
Baseline Viral Load | NVP (n=74) | NVP-placebo |
>100,000 | 54% |
68% |
>250,000 | 45% |
38% |
>500,000 | 32% |
23% |
The primary analysis looks at plasma
HIV-RNA response. In the AZT/3TC alone group there was an initial
viral load drop of about 2 log. By about 24 weeks the viral load
increased to about 1 log below baseline and remained at that
level out to 64 weeks. The NVP+AZT/3TC group had close to 3 log
drop at week 16 and just over 2.5 log drop at week 64.
Response of those with High Baseline Viral Loads.
At week 48, the proportion of Patients below 50 copies/ml
ITT follows. The numbers were small for those above 500,000. 42%
with below 100,000 (21/36) had below 50 copies/ml, and 17/38
(55%) with above 100,000 copies/ml had below 50 copies/ml at week
48.
NVP | Placebo | |
>100,000 | 55% |
0% |
>500,000 | 54% |
0% |
Overall | 49% |
0% |
About 50% in the NVP arm remained
below 50 copies at week 64. Pollard said there was no statistical
relationship at week 48 between baseline viral load and drop in
viral load on therapy. CD4 increased about 120 in NVP arm after 1
year compared to 50 CD4 increase in AZT/3TC arm at 1 year.
-------------------------------
PMPA
Ian McGowan, from Gilead Sciences, reported data from study 902
in which PMPA (administered once daily) was simply added onto
ongoing therapy for individuals. This data was previously
reported at ICAAC in September. More details of this study are
available on NATAP web site in ICAAC Highlights Reports.
He reported data first from study 901 which was a 4-week, placebo
controlled, dose ranging study in treatment naïve and
experienced patients.
Three doses were given: 75 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, all once
daily. For the experienced group receiving the highest dose of
300 mg there was a 1.06 log reduction, while the
treatment-naïve group experienced a 1.51 log reduction.
Three PMPA once daily doses were given: 75, 150, or 300 mg. The
median time on study 902 is now 37 weeks with a range of 32-60
weeks. The patients had about 4.5 years of prior treatment
experience. The mean baseline CD4 and viral load in the 300 mg
dose arm (n=55) was 378 and 3.74 log (5,500 copies/ml). 91% were
male.
Baseline NRTI Resistance (n=187) The study group was very
treatment experienced. 6% of patients had no NRTI mutations at
baseline. About 60% of patients had PI mutations. 35% had NNRTI
mutations. 43% had high AZT resistance with 3TC resistance
(M184V). 24% had high AZT resistance. 19% had low AZT resistance
with the M184V (3TC) mutation.
Viral Load Response
There was a dose dependent response with a mean of 0.75 log drop
in 300 mg group at week 24.
Over the course of the study they did not see a significant CD4
rise in any arms.
Nephrotoxicity.
The incidence of serious adverse events: 3/28 (11%) in placebo
arm, 5/53 (9%) in 75 mg arm, 8/51 (16%) in 150 mg arm, 3/54 (6%)
in 300 mg arm. Grade 1 creatinine toxicity is a rise above 0.5
mg/dL So far they have not observed any rises above 0.5 mg in
serum creatinine in the 300 mg group except for a few
fluctuations.
---------------------------------
Combination Therapy in Pregnant HIV-infected Women and
Their Newborns
Katjia Wolf, from the University Childrens Hospital in
Basel, reported on this study whose aim is to assess the safety
of combination therapy in pregnant HIV infected women and their
newborns.
Women received 2 or more anti-retroviral drugs and their
newborns.
By October 1999, there were 103 pregnancies, 95 children born,
and there is complete data on 85 mother-child pairs. 6
pregnancies are ongoing, there was 1 induced abortion, 1
extrauterine pregnancy.
About 40% of women diagnosed with HIV during pregnancy. Most
women (67%) were at CDC stage A, 22% at stage B. During 1st
trimester, 62 women had median viral load of 5000 copies/ml (3.7
log), 26% had below 400 copies/ml, and CD4 was 378. During 3rd
trimester, 72 women had median viral load of 200 (2.3 log), 65%
had below 400 copies/ml, and CD4 was 453.
1st Trimester | 3rd Trimester | |
N | 62 |
72 |
Viral load | 5000 |
200 |
<400 copies | 26% |
65% |
CD4 | 378 |
453 |
The women were prone to use drugs
which may effect newborns: i.v. drug use (5), methadone (6),
cigarette smoking (22), alcohol (5), benzos/barbituates (3).
Women were also receiving concomittant therapy: cotrimoxazole
(13), antimycotics (10), antiemetics (6), psychotropes (3),
ciprofloxacin (1), pentamidine (1), other (6).
At some time during pregnancy 100% were on NRTIs, 62% on PI
therapy and 1% on hydroxyurea. During the first trimester 39%
were on treatment and 26% on PI therapy. At delivery all were
receiving treatment and 88% received i.v. AZT according to 076
protocol. One women received a single dose of NVP at delivery.
Median viral load at delivery was 2.26 log (below 400 copies/ml
in 64%).
Nelfinavir (27) was most commonly used PI: IDV (19), RTV (8), SQV
(7). AZT and 3TC were used by 77, d4T (16), ddI (8), NVP (2).
Mild anemia was the most frequently experienced lab abnormality:
grade 1 or 2 (n=81)- 15 on RTIs and 26 on RTIs + PIs. Other
abnormalities, such as thrombopenia, LFT elevations, amylase
elevation and cholesterol were generally not severe nor
associated with clinical symptoms.
NRTIs | Protease Inhibitors | ||
Anemia | |||
-Grade 1 or 2 | 81 |
15 |
26 |
-Grade 3 or 4 | 2 |
2 |
|
Thrombopenia | 79 |
3 |
3 |
LFT elevation | 75 |
5 |
7 |
Amylase elevation | 59 |
4 |
4 |
Cholesterol elevation | 35 |
3 |
5 |
Clinical Adverse Events (n=85) |
5Women were often suffering with nausea and vomiting or diarrhea. Neurological symptoms were also quite frequent, mostly headaches.
RTIs | RTIs+Protease inhibitors | |
GI Symptoms | 6 |
13 |
Neurologic | 5 |
4 |
Diabetes | 1 |
2 |
Hypertension | 1 |
2 |
Nephrolithiasis | 0 |
2 |
Glucose intolerance | 2 |
0 |
Most of children (86%) were
delivered by elective C-section (primary 66% before onset of
labor and rupture of membranes). 14% (n=12) had vaginal delivery.
Newborns (mean follow-up: 7.8 months (birth 26 months) 92%
received AZT suspension for 6 weeks; 5% for less than 6 weeks 9%
had combination therapy: I recd single dose of NVP after birth;
most recd double therapy none of children were breastfed13% recd
concomitant treatment with mostly antibiotics
Anemia was most frequent lab abnormality in newborns. 7 babies
had grade 3 anemia leading to withdrawal of AZT in one. 2
required transfusions. 18/39 babies experienced anemia in first
week of life and 17 recd AZT in utero (10 RTIs, 8 RTIs+PI). 21/28
babies experienced anemia during weeks 2-4. 1 baby had
thrombopenia and 2 with transient elevated LFTs.
Clinical Adverse Events for Newborns
As previously reported they found a high prematurity (<37
weeks) birth rate in this study (11 receiving RTIs and 13
receiving RTIs+PI). 6 experienced neurologic symptoms but 3 were
on drug withdrawal.
RTIs | RTIS+PI | |
Prematurity (<37 weeks) | 11 |
13 |
Neurologic symptoms | 3 |
3 |
Low birth weight* | 2 |
3 |
Cryptorchidism | 2 |
2 |
Angioma | 0 |
2 |
Extrahepatic biliary atresia | 0 |
1 |
CNS hemorrhage (term born) | 0 |
1 |
*below 10th percentile in weight
So far there have been two perinatal transmissions. One was
receiving AZT=3TC, had a vaginal delivery with 3077 copies/ml of
viral load. The other was receiving AZT+3TC+NFV, had a secondary
C-section and had 10,000 copies/ml viral load. Delivery was not
optimal for these two women and both women had a detectable viral
load. All other children have negative HIV test results at about
4 months.
Investigators compared prematurity rate of children in this study
to those of the Swiss Neonatal HIV Study exposed to AZT only or
to no HIV therapy at all and found it to be higher in children on
combination therapy when compared to children receiving no
therapy during pregnancy (p=0.001).
This Study |
AZT only* |
No Therapy* |
|
N | 85 |
112 |
452 |
Prematurity | 28% |
17% |
14% |
In summary, adverse events occurred
in 72% of women but were not unexpected and were not life
threatening. And in 55% of newborns with 3 unexpected findings:
high prematurity rate, CNS hemorrhage in a term born baby, 1 case
of extrahepatic biliary atresia. Wolf concluded there was no
clear evidence of a major risk of intrauterine exposure to
combination therapy. But there was a high rate of prematurity and
1 major malformation which demand further inquiry. Therefore, a
long term observation of large group is necessary. When asked by
panel what she thought a pregnant women should do in terms of
treatment, Wolf said it should be womens decision based on
an informed consent about the risk of therapy and for her own
health if shes not taking combination therapy during
pregnancy. If the patient asked for Wolfs recommendation,
she said she would recommend combination anti-retroviral therapy
during pregnancy.
---------------------------
Switching from PI to NVP Regimen in HIV+ Subjects under
long-term successful treatment
There has been a good deal of discussion and abstracts at this
conference on switching people from PI to non-PI regimens (either
abacavir or NNRTI based triple regimens) in the hopes of
alleviating metabolic complications, lipodystrophy syndrome,
improving adherence, reducing pill burden, and improving quality
of life. Several studies have been reported on switching people
to a triple abacavir NRTI regimen or a NNRTI based regimen. In
this study 138 patients were randomized to switch to NVP with the
same NRTIs (n=104) or to continue with their current
PI-containing regimen (n=34). They were on their PI regimen for
more than 1 year, had above 200 CD4s, and had below 50 copies/ml
for more than 6 months. All were NNRTI-naïve.
Prior exposure to PI therapy was about 17 months for both groups.
Those in NVP group had 9.4 months below 50 copies/ml and those in
PI group had 8.7 months below 50 copies/ml. CD4 count was not
significantly different at baseline (640 in NVP group; 500 in PI
group; CD4 % was 25 in NVP group and 22% in PI-group).
Cholesterol and triglycerides were about the same in both groups
( 245 chol. and 290 trig.; about 75% in both groups had above 200
mg/dL chol.) About 60% in both groups had trig.above 200 mg/dL.
And about 70% in both groups had lipodystrophic body-shape
changes. There was an inversion of the HDL/LDL ratio.
Results
Barreiro reported (ITT analysis) 29% in the PI arm and 11% in the
NVP arm experienced a virologic rebound to over 50 copies/ml at 6
months. The difference was statistically significant. At the time
of failure median values of viral load tended to be higher for
those continuing on PI (54% on PI and 31% on NVP above 500
copies/ml). A higher incidence of poorer compliance was reported
for those failing PI regimen (90% vs 22%). In 3/7 patients on NVP
regimen they detected codon mutations to one of the drugs in
combination. Two patients had NVP mutations and 1 with 3TC
mutation. No resistance was detected in those failing PI regimen.
Those switching to NVP had a mean loss of 35 CD4s but those
continuing on PI had mean increase in CD4s of 64 at 6 months.
A trend towards a reduction in both trig. and chol. (10-15%) was
seen in both groups but there was no statistical significance. In
the PI group 73% had chol above 200 at baseline and 64% at month
6. In the NVP group 77% had chol above 200 at baseline and 58% at
month 6. Regarding trig., 61% in the PI group had above 200 at
baseline and 47% at month 6. In the NVP group 57% had above 200
tig. at baseline and 45% at 6 months. None received lipid
lowering drugs. But all were advised to follow a low-fat diet
which could explain this observation.
Based on patient survey and physician examination, 72% had
lipodystrophy features at baseline and 6 months later 50% in NVP
group reported at least partial improvement while no one in PI
group reported improvement. Half of them reported some
improvement in these features after 6 months switching to NVP.
Barreiro reported the pill burden reduction had a positive impact
on quality of life. Patients were asked to rate quality of life
from 1 to 10. Mean scores were 4.4 for PI regimen and 9.1 for NVP
regimen.
Using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of PI Therapy and
Genotypic Testing
Andrew Urban, from the University of Wisconsin at Madison,
reported preliminary cross-sectional data from study looking at
prospective use of 2 technologiesgenotypic resistance
testing and pharmacokinetic profiling in protease inhibitors in
the management of HIV in their clinic population. Urban went on
to say that the role of therapeutic drug monitoring is
controversial for a number of reasons including the variability
in PK parameters both among and between individuals, we dont
have established pharmacodynamic predictors of ART efficacy,
certain drugs work in tissue compartments which are not readily
accessible such as NNRTIs, protein binding plays a significant
role in free drug concentrations amongst the protease inhibitors,
and the logistic and practical difficulties of getting drug
levels in the clinic setting.
Urban said despite these difficulties its becoming increasingly
clear that pharmacokinetics of these drugs is playing an
important role in the success of anti-retroviral therapy (ART).
This study consists of patients who are on an initial or first
salvage PI HAART regimen. Virologically successful patients
(n=17) have viral load below 500 copies/ml. These patients are
undergoing prospective evaluation with clinical assessment, CD4s,
viral loads, and PK monitoring. At the time of study entry they
have a complete PK profile performed and prospectively in
patients with sub-optimal PK they randomize patients to adjusted
dose versus a fixed dose. Patients who are virologically failing
(above 500 copies/ml; n=15) on at least two measurements a month
apart. These patients also undergo a baseline PK profile and also
genotypic resistance testing. Based on the results of these
evaluation,s they have drugs altered in the regimen and/or PI
dose adjusted and are also followed prospectively. The endpoints
are durability of viral suppression in the success arm and in
both arms change in HIV-RNA.
The PK profile is performed around the observed dose of the
protease inhibitor. Patients are instructed to come to clinic and
take their dose as they would at home. Timed samples are taken
before the dose is administered and also at one half-hour, 1
hour, 2 hrs, and 4 hrs after taking the dose. Optimal PK is
defined as plasma concentrations within or exceeding a targeted
range. Sub-optimal is defined as below this range. They target
the Cmin concentrations of protease inhibitors as the parameter
to target in prospective parts of study.
The reference ranges they are using:
Agent | Dosing Regimen | Cmin (ug/ml) | Cmax (ug/ml) |
NFV | 750mg tid |
0.7-1.0 |
3.0-4.0 |
IDV | 800mg q8h |
>0.15 |
8.0 |
SQV | 800mg q12h |
>0.05 |
0.09-0.25 |
RTV | 600mg q12h |
1.1-4.1 |
7.6-14.8 |
At baseline 17 individuals in
success group were 43 (29-55) years old, 13/4 male/female, 5/17
had prior PI, 477 CD4s, and below 2.70 log viral load. The
failure group of 15 persons were 41 years old (30-61), 14/1
male/female, 9/15 had prior PI, 304 CD4s, amd 3.66 log (4500
copies/ml) viral load. Patients have been on 0-6 NRTIs prior to
this study. Mean duration of current PI in success group was
about 79 weeks (18-130). Several individuals were taking other
drugs which can affect p450: RTV/SQV, NVP, or FLU. Nine were on
NFV regimen, 6 IDV, 2 SQV (1 combined with RTV; 1 person on 600
tid SQV). Some were taking NFV tid and some were taking FV bid.
For the failure group, 8 were on NFV regimen (on tid and bid), 3
were on IDV (2 persons taking IDV 1200 q12h), 3 on SQV 1200 q12h
and 1 person on RTV/SQV. Again, 9 persons in failure group were
taking concomitant drugs effecting p450: DLV, EFV, NVP, FLU. Mean
duration of PI use was 49 weeks (4-128).
In the failure group at baseline 87% had evidence of high-level
resistance to at least one component of their HAART regimen. 40%
had resistance to more than one.
Failure Group- Number of Patients with Baseline Genotypic
Resistance Mutations
Drug | Primary Mutation(s) | Secondary Mutation(s) | No Mutations |
NFV | 2/8 (25%) |
6/8 (75%) |
2/8 (25%) |
IDV | 2/3 (67%) |
3/3 (100%) |
|
SQV | 1/3 (33%) |
3/3 (100%) |
|
RTV | 1/1 (100%) |
1/1 (100%) |
Pharmacokinetics
In the virologically successful group 65% had optimal PK (within
Cmin ranges listed above) versus 21% in the virologic failure
group. This was statistically significant. There is no
statistically significant difference between the two groups when
looking at Cmax with the successes having 53% and the failures
43% within the target ranges. In looking at failures with
sub-optimal PK about half had evidence of primary protease
mutations. In looking at group that had optimal PK but were
virologically failing all had primary mutations to their protease
inhibitor.
In looking at NFV PK parameters of succeses versus failures there
is statistically significant difference in the Cmin. The number
of patients on other PIs were too small to analyze. There was no
statistical significant difference in AUC between 2 groups
although successes had greater AUC than failures.
Parameter | Successes (n=9) | Failures (N=6) | p-value |
AUC 24 ug/ml.h | 61.7 |
39 |
0.24 |
Cmin ug/ml | 1.78 |
0.59 |
0.02 |
Cmax ug/ml | 1.95 |
0.49 |
0.01 |
Urban concluded that PI therapeutic
drug monitoring may have a role in the management of ARV therapy.
Virological failures demonstrated evidence of sub-optimal PK and
genotypic resistance. At least in the NFV patients optimal Cmin
concentrations correlate with virologic success.
----------------------------
IL-2 + HAART for Persons with Low CD4s Despite Effective
HAART
Christine Katlama reported on study ANSR 082 which is a
randomized comparitive open-label study in 19 centers in France
of IL-2 in patients with CD4 below 200 despite effective HAART.
Patients were included in this study if they had CD4 count
between 50-200, if their viral load was below 1000 copies/ml, and
on stable HAART for a minimum of 6 months.
Patients were randomized to IL-2 +HAART or no IL-2. The IL-2 was
given sub-cutaneous 4.5 MIU bid in 4 cycles of 5 days every 6
weeks up to week 24. After 24 weeks IL-2 was given sc 9 MIU qd
for 5 days every 8 weeks up to week 80. After week 24 IL-2 was
offered to initial control group and if they still fit the
inclusion criteria. 72 patients were randomized and 70 were
evaluated. 31 patients in the IL-2 group completed the 24 weeks
on IL-2. Three of 34 patients discontinued: 1 for adverse event,
1 wanted to stop, and 1 for progression to KS. Five patients
reduced their dose.
After 24 weeks, 89% in the control group started IL-2 and 82% in
IL-2 group continued with IL-2. 55% of patients in both groups
had a prior AIDS defining event. They were all on mean duration
of HAART for about 18 months. At initiation of HAART CD4 was
about 65. After 6 months on HAART CD4s were 113 in IL-2 group and
89 in control group. At study entry CD4s were 149 in IL-2 group
(n=34) and 138 in control group (n=36). The % with below 100 CD4s
was 15% in the IL-2 group and 22% in the control group.
76% in the IL-2 group and 89% in the control group had below 200
copies/ml. 18% in the IL-2 group and 8% in the control group had
200-500 copies/ml. And, 6% in the IL-2 group and 3% in the
control group had 500-1000 copies/ml.
Results
At week 24 by ITT analysis, there was a highly significant
difference between the two groups. The median CD4 count was 220
in the IL-2 group (range 101-394) and 158 (30-281) in the control
group. The median increase was 65 (12-228) in the IL-2 group and
18 (-60 to 107) in the control group. The % of patients with CD4
increase of at least 50 was 73% in the 1L-2 group and 22% in the
control group. The % with at least an 80 CD4 increase was 41% in
the IL-2 group and 3% in the control group.
During the study 6 in the IL-2 group and 2 in control group had
transient rise in viral load above 1000 copies/ml. Within 1 or 2
evaluation points the viral load returned to below 1000.
There was a significant increase in the proliferation activity
against CMV with 58% in the IL-2 group who became positive (30%
at baseline) compared to 21% (44% at baseline) in the control
group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups
at baseline and week 24 using PPD, tetanus and p24 Ag. There was
no activity at baseline and week 24 against p24.
There was a significant higher rise both in memory cells (44 in
IL-2 group versus 1 in control group) and naïve cells (27 IL-2
versus 5 in control). Nearly all patients experienced the
expected IL-2 side effects: fever, fatigue, muscle pain, nausea,
rhinitis, sweats, dry skin/mouth, rash, arthralgia, insomnia,
headache. But there was only 1 discontinuation of IL-2 and 5 dose
reductions. Over 90% experienced fever and fatigue.
Additional cycles of IL-2 may result in continued increases in
CD4s.