Lisbon Report Nine
Jules Levin, NATAP
1. Switching from Pi to abacavir regimen: preliminary 16 week
data
2. Triple NRTI Initial Therapy--3TC+AZT+DDI: preliminary
data
This report contains results reported at Lisbon on a study
switching individuals with below 50 copies/ml from a PI to
abacavir, and a second small open-label study (n=26) initiating
therapy with 3 NRTIs (AZT+3TC+DDI).
Replacing Protease Inhibitor with Abacavir: Preliminary
16-Week Data
N Clumeck from the Hospital St. Pierre in Brussels, Belgium
reported on preliminary study data at 16 weeks from CNA30017
which explored switching individuals to abacavir in place of
their PI. 211 individuals were randomized in an open-label
comparison to continue their PI+2 NRTIs regimen or to continue
their 2 NRTIs plus abacavir in place of the PI. The objectives of
the study are to compare long-term durability of antiviral
response (48 weeks), plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 profiles, safety
and tolerance, and quality of life. Treatment failure is defined
as above 400 copies/ml on two consecutive occasions or premature
discontinuation of study treatment for any reason.
Individuals had to have a minimum of 6 months prior duration on
their current PI+2 NRTI regimen, HIV-RNA undetectable since the
beginning of ART, and below 50 copies/ml at screening. 80% in the
abacavir (ABC) arm and 78% in the PI arm had received ART for
over 12 months prior to study entry: Im assuming the PI
regimen people were taking at study entry was their first
treatment, and that they were treatment-naive previously. I did
not see this question addressed in the presentation or abstract.
Here is a list of drugs people were taking at prior to study:
NRTIs (%) ABC PI
AZT/3TC 61% 63%
D4T/3TC 26% 24%
PI (%)
IDV 64% 52%
NFV 11 17
RTV 9 7
RTV/SQV 5 14
At baseline median CD4s in both arms were about 505 (ranges
varied from 70-1500); median triglycerides (mmol/l) were 1.68 in
the ABC arm and 1.64 in the PI arm; median cholesterol (mmol/l)
was 5.18 in ABC arm and 5.34 in PI arm. It appears that lipids
testing were non-fasting.
Results
105 were randomized to ABC and 106 to continue PI. 102 recd ABC
treatment and 103 PI treatment. There were 3 discontinuations due
to adverse event in the ABC arm and 2 in PI arm. There were 2
hypersensitivity reactions in the ABC arm. There were 2 virologic
failures in each arm. One withdrew from the ABC arm and 3 in the
PI arm. And 1 was lost to follow-up in the PI arm. In total, 6 in
the ABC arm and 8 in the PI arm were considered treatment
failures.
75% in the ABC arm and 57% in the PI arm experienced at least 1
adverse event. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (75%
in ABC arm v 57% in PI arm), diarrhea (16% v 6%), headache (5% v
10%), and malaise & fatigue (14% v 5%). I think some aspects
of this comparison may be unfair. Of course ABC has its own set
of side effects and potential toxicity but people on PI regimen
at baseline likely experienced side effects upon starting regimen
which may subside or they may get used to them after a while on
therapy.
Two persons in the ABC arm had grade 3/4 elevated triglycerides
and 3 in the PI arm. The investigator did not say if these two
had these elevations prior to switching. One person in PI arm had
grade 3/4 elevated cholesterol and none in ABC arm. These were
drawn non-fasting.
There was a trend for decreasing triglycerides and cholesterol at
week 16 following the switch in the ABC arm. While it appeared on
the slide graph that the lipids in the PI arm remained about the
same. The CD4s at week 16 increased slightly in the PI arm but
remained about the same in the ABC arm. Clumeck summarized that
preliminary 16 week data suggest TRIG and CHOL may decrease from
ABC switch and also incident to ABC switch are reduced pill
burden (ABC is one pill twice daily; Glaxo is developing one pill
containing both ABC and AZT/3TC), and low risk of drug-drug
interactions. Although there are no differences at week 16 in
virologic failures between the two groups I think its
premature to assess that parameter at week 16.
As Ive reported previously in Lisbon summaries (see Lisbon
Reports on NATAP web site), there were a number of studies
reported at Lisbon on switching individuals to a PI sparing from
a PI regimen due to concerns about tolerability, adherence, side
effects and toxicities related to protesases. Studies looked at
people switching from PI regimens to NVP, EFV or ABC regimens.
The study presenting data on people initiating therapy with 3
NRTIsAZT+3TC+DDI is reported below. And of course the
Atlantic Study reported preliminary 48 week data on a triple NRTI
regimen of 3TC+d4T+DDI. In this study there was a trend for
people with viral load above 50,000 at baseline to not have as
high a proportion of patients in study below 50 copies/ml at week
48.
In a study on switching people from a PI to a NVP regimen,
reported as a Late Breaker, and reported in detail in the Lisbon
Reports on the NATAP web site, Barreiro reported (ITT analysis)
29% in the PI arm and 11% in the NVP arm experienced a virologic
rebound to over 50 copies/ml at 6 months after half of patients
switched to NVP and half remained on PI regimen. The difference
was statistically significant. A higher incidence of poorer
compliance was reported for those failing PI regimen (90% vs
22%).
Based on patient survey and physician examination, 72% had
lipodystrophy features at baseline and 6 months later 50% in NVP
group reported at least partial improvement while no one in PI
group reported improvement. Barreiro reported the pill burden
reduction had a positive impact on quality of life. Patients were
asked to rate quality of life from 1 to 10. Mean scores were 4.4
for PI regimen and 9.1 for NVP regimen. One criticism leveled at
this study and others is that there is no evidence using
objective parameters showing reversal of fat wasting in the
periphery, other than patient and doctor observation. In a number
of NVP switching studies, apparently elevated CHOL and TRIG are
reduced while the data is more mixed on switching to EFV. In most
studies, TRIG do not decrease except in one study where it did
decrease. The total CHOL doesnt decrease although the good
CHOL (HDL) goes up. Graham Moyles presentation on switching
to EFV will be summarized and reported separately.
I think if a person is completely able to be compliant with a PI
regimen it may not be advisable to switch to a PI-sparing
regimen. But if there are concerns about compliance and
tolerability, particularly high elevations in lipids, and pill
burden the data suggests a PI-sparing regimen may be effective.
Of course the persons individual situation must be
considered in making these decisions. Additional treatment
interventions can be made: lipid lowering drugs can reduce
elevations but you have to be cautious about drug-drug
interactions between PI or NNRTI and lipid lowering drug; diet
and exercise help some individuals reduce lipids and glucose,
improve overall sense of well being, and can reduce weight and
stomach fat; HGH may reduce fat depots such as stomach but do not
appear to reverse fat wasting in periphery. HGH can increase
glucose.
This Sundays NATAP radio show focuses on lipodystrophy. The
guests are Michael Dube of USC, and Joep Lange of the University
of Amsterdam. The show is 11 pm to 12 midnight every Sunday on
WOR 710 AM.. Free live audio and free RealAudio is available on
the WOR web sitewww.WOR710.com Free tapes of shows are
available through NATAP.
Three NRTIs as Initial Therapy: AZT+ddI+3TC
C Compagnon reported on this small open-label pilot study on
behalf of the Community Hospital HIV studies Group Rothschild,
Paris and Glaxo Wellcome. 26 individuals with HIV RNA above
10,000 copies/ml and 200 CD4s received Combivir (3TC 150mg+AZT
300mg) one pill bid + ddI 150 mg two pills once daily for 48
weeks. They used the Roche Amplicor Assay with a detection limit
of 200 copies/ml and the analysis was Intent-to-Treat (ITT). As
well, a Roche Ultra-sensitive below 20 copies/ml test was used.
Missing data were replaced by last observation carried forward
(LOCF), except in the case of early withdrawal. Patients who
discontinued treatment were considered as failures. Statistical
comparisons between adherence data and HIV RNA were performed
using non-parametric Wilcoxon tests.
At baseline, patients had median viral load of 79,400 copies/ml
(range 4.0 to 6.0 log), median CD4 of 504 (range 270-1449).
Results-
67% (ITT) had below 200 copies/ml at week 48(n=30); in the
Atlantic Study one arm received 3TC+d4T+DDI and 57% (ITT) had
below 500 copies/ml and 49% had below 50 copies/ml at week 48 47%
(ITT) had below 20 copies/ml at week 48; at week 36, 60% had
below 20 copies/ml. But this study did not report data on people
with high HIV RNA, such as above 100,000 copies/ml at baseline
median viral load reduction was 3.2 log at week 48 median CD4
increase was 169 at week 48 patients who were classified as
adherent had a statistically significant greater viral load
reduction at week 48 than those who were classified as
non-adherent (aprx. 2.75 log v 3.25 log) 83% (n=25) experienced
at least 1 adverse event 43% (n=13) experienced at least 1 drug
related adverse event the most common frequent drug-related
adverse events were nausea and vomiting (27%), leucopenia (20%),
abnormal liver function tests (13%) of the 7 serious adverse
events, 1 was considered drug related, a severe anemia occurred
at week 16 that led to stopping study treatment. Two others
permanently stopped study treatment because of non-serious
adverse events: 1 for anemia, and leuconeutropenia, and one for
nausea
Of 8 individuals characterized as non-adherent by
investigators opinion, 8 gave as reason missing 1 or more
dose(s). None said size of pills. In some cases, study drug was
stopped during a holiday or because of fatigue.
A concern about triple NRTI regimens that has been raised is the
question of possible increased experience of mitochondrial
toxicity. Continuing to follow a large set of patients for a
prolonged period can address this question. Possibly a
meta-analysis of all triple NRTIS study regimens could be
performed in the future.