Durban World AIDS Conference
Thursday, July 13
Durban, South Africa
Reported by Jules Levin
Report 18
Thursday
night at 8:45pm in the press room. The conference is winding down. People are in
a celebratory mode on the last night. Today was the last for scientific reports.
Tomorrow morning is the closing ceremony where Nelson Mandela will speak and the
usual summaries of the science reported here. There is a sense of relief that
its over. Many people are gathering and going out to Dinner.
This
conference was I think a turning point in how the world will deal with AIDS.
It's a milestone in that Durban has put the AIDS crisis in developing countries
on the map and minds of people throughout the developing world. Every night on
CNN, whose coverage was great as I watched it in my hotel room, Americans were
able to hear about the crisis in Africa, about South Africa, Pres. Mbeki, and
the awful suffering and deprivation of people with AIDS on this continent.
Personally, this experience has very much affected my own thoughts and feelings
about this problem. I had decided not to attend this meeting but changed my mind
about 1 month ago. It was a very good decision. In Geneva, at the last World
Conference, I was only interested in data to bring back to the USA. Here in
Durban, I was grabbed by the atmosphere, the people, the suffering, India's
problem, and the compelling need to do something. This conference was different
than Geneva. This conference was
intimate, the convention center is much more intimate than the one in Geneva.
Every day immediately outside the convention center was a series of tents
holding food vendors serving all the local fodos you might want. But, I only ate
in the hotel. The atmosphere was festive and it appeared to me that everyone was
excited to be here and they all felt this was an historical and precedent
setting event.
I was
one of those people that thought there would not be enough interesting science
here but I was wrong. Most people I speak with feel there was a good amount of
interesting science. Although some of the science was not well done. There was a
good deal of interaction in the science sessions. I leave Durban on Saturday and
will be stopping in London for a few days before heading back to NYC (The Big
Apple). As I previously mentioned, several researchers are covering Durban for
NATAP and you will be receiving reports from them and me. All reports are posted
to the NATAP web site for reference.
Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine
(HCQ)+hydroxyurea+ddI: a new economical triple therapy
This
presentation was an oral late breaker at today's Thursday late breaker session.
There was a good deal of discussion through the earlier days expressing
expectation for hearing about this drug for treating HIV. Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine
(HCQ) are inexpensive drugs with anti-HIV activity in vivo. I spoke with the
author of this study, N Paton from Tan Tock Hospital in Singapore, and he told
me that HCQ has anti-HIV activity in vitro and in humans.. This report relates
on their prospective open-label pilot study to evaluate the safety, tolerability
and efficacy of the combination of HCQ, hydroxyurea, and ddI. Since the drug is
not patented they are looking for funding to conduct future studies. Paton told
me HCQ has antiviral activity approximating AZT (0.5 log) and I think it might
be worth considering combining it with an abacavir triple NRTI regimen. He said
its safe and tolerable.
HCQ and
CQ are used for arhtritis and malaria. In vitro studies have shown HCQ/CQ can
decrease viral replication. As well, it increases pH in cytoplasmic vesicles,
inhibits post-translational modification of gp120, and inhibits IL-6 production.
Actually, a funny situation surrounded the presentation on HCQ/CQ. Paton was
supposed to deliver the talk but because the times were wrong in the program his
slides were there but he was not. So, Brian Gazzard, UK researcher showed his
slides but was unable to offer much comment. So he made it quite humorous.
However, the slides related the history of HCQ monotherapy trials.
Sperber
et al 1995
HCQ vs placebo:
HCQ significantly reduced viral load
Sperber
et al 1997
HCQ vs AZT. HCQ reduced viral load by 0.38 log at 16/52
Boelaert
and Sperber 1998
In
vitro: CQ adds to ddI & hydroxyurea (HU) activity
They
studied 20 anti-retroviral naÔve patients with viral load <100,000 copies/ml, CD4 count >150 cells and no
opportunistic infections within the previous 6 months. Patients received the
combination of hydroxychloroquine (200 mg bid), hydroxyurea, (500 mg bid) and
ddI (125/200 mg bid) for 24 weeks. The study was conducted from September 1999
to May 2000. The study was conducted at a single site in Singapore. People were
excluded for diabetes, retinal disease, psoriasis, G6PD deficiency, peripheral
neuropathy, previous pancreatitis, hepatotoxic medication, LFTs >3 x ULN,
hemoglobin <10g/dL, neutrophils <1000, platelets <120,000. The
following labs were monitored: FBC, UEC, LFT, PT/PTT, amylase, glucose, fasting
cholesterol, triglycerides, opthalmology exam, viral load, and CD4s. There
were23 eligible patients recruited. 6 withdrew (non-compliance). 17 completed
the study (13 Chinese, 2 Indian, 1 Thai, 1 Malay; 16 stage A, 1 stage B
disease). The median age was 34.
VIRAL
LOAD. Baseline viral load was 21,848 copies/ml (3892-81,394), CD4 242 (167-414).
At week 12, 5 patients (29%) had undetectable viral load (<400 copies/ml).
The mean viral load reduction was 1.27 log. At week 24, 6 patients (35%) had
undetectable viral load and the mean viral load reduction was -1.23 ±
0.58 log.
CD4s.
The CD4 change at week 12 was +28 (±134)
at week 12, and 64 at week 24 (±120).
The CD4 percent change was 4.3 (±5.7)
at week 12 and 5.5 (±5.6)
at week 24. The CD8 change was -192 (±267)
at week 12, and -163 (±307)
at week 24. The CD8 percent change at week 12 was -8.8 (±4.2)
at week 12 and -10.5 (±7.8)
at week 24.
ADVERSE
EVENTS: diarrhea 11, cough 9, fatigue 8, pruritis 6, dry skin 5, fever 5,
anorexia 5. There were 2 grade 3 AEs: neutropenia and increased amylase. Grade
2: 2 nutropenia, 2 thrombocytopenia, 1 increased AST, 1 increased bilirubin, 2
increased amylase, 1 increased glucose.Grade 1: 1 anemia, 8 nuetropenia, 5
increased ALT, 2 increased AST, 2 increased bilirubin, 5 increased amylase.
There was 1 grade 1 peripheral neuropathy, and 2 unrelated serious AEs:
haematesis, liver absecess.
Paton
concluded the drug to be safe and well tolerated, moderately effective:
May be
useful in patients with low viral load
Better
than nothing even in patients with high viral load
May not
need <400 copies/ml if no association between nadir and time to rebound
(resistance)
Cost
attractive (US$ 250-350, or less)
Due to
poor access to treatment in developing countries and limited resources to buy
drugs, the authors are planning a study in Uganda. Itís a pilot phase Iib
randomized placebo double blinded study to last 8 weeks. 40 patients will
receive 600mg chloroquine phosphate or placebo daily and will be evaluated every
2 weeks for adverse events, immunologic & virologic markers. Labs and
opthalmologic exams will also be monitored.