XIII
NATAP at the Durban World AIDS Conference 2000
Durban, South Africa, July 9-14
Simplification
is not so easy:
Reported By Graeme Moyle, MD, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London
UK
The
introduction of potent three (or more) drug antiretroviral therapy regimens
(highly active antiretroviral therapy, HAART) has dramatically modified the
natural history of HIV-1 infection. However, HAART regimens are unable to
eradicate HIV-1 infection, thus establishing the current HIV therapeutic
paradigm of giving antiretroviral therapy for an indefinite period. Initial
studies evaluating treatment deintensification to more convenient maintenance
regimens following, generally, 24 weeks of induction to <50 copies/ml with
HAART regimens is not able to maintain the suppression of HIV replication
[1ñ3]. The failure in these studies may have been due an insufficiently long
induction phase.
In
patients involved in the ADAM study [1], a second cohort of patients were
evaluated to test the effect of a longer period of induction therapy on the
feasibility of a treatment deintensification [4]. Antiretroviral therapy naive
patients were treated with a 4 drug induction regimen (d4T + 3TC + saquinavir
(initially as hard gel) (SQV) + nelfinavir (NFV)) for 26 or 50 weeks.
Randomization at week 26 was discontinued following an interim analysis that
showed inferior suppression of viral replication
during maintenance therapy [1]. At week 50, patients were randomized to
maintenance therapy (either d4T +
NFV or SQV + NFV) or continued quadruple therapy if the plasma HIV-1 RNA levels
at weeks 48 and 49 were both below the limit of quantification (<50
copies/ml). After randomization, monthly monitoring of viral load in plasma was
performed. Treatment failure was
defined as two consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements
>100 copies/mL. Of original 65 patients who commence the induction
regimen, 16 patients had been randomized at week 26. Of the remaining 49
patients, 17 patients were randomized at week 50. Ten patients were randomized
to either D4T/NFV (6) or SQV/NFV (4). In
both arms one patient withdrew after randomization. Treatment failure was
observed in 4/8 patients who deintensified compared to 1/5 evaluable patients on
quadruple therapy (p=0.56). In the patients randomized to deintensify at week 26
and at week 50, kaplan-Meier
analysis indicated time to > 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL in plasma was
comparable.
The
authors concluded a longer period of indcution does not postpone recurrence of
viral replication following deintensification [4].
Given
this disappointment, the next best thing may be to simplify regimen
administration, reducing the frequency of dosing of tablet volume. Several
studies looking at different drugs evaluated this possibility. Based on
pharmacokinetic data presented last year [5] which indicated a dose of 100mg of
ritonavir with 1200mg of indinavir resulted in higher indinavir exposure and a
similar or higher trough level of indinavir to tid dosing a case-control study
was performed at two Italian clinics. Patients on an indinavir-containing
regimen and with viral load <50 copies/ml were offered change to once daily
indinavir/ritonavir. Matched controls were selected based from the clinics
database.
Twelve
patient have completed 16 weeks of follow-up. Baseline characteristics included
viral load <50 for 16 months and CD4 369 cells/mm3. No viral
rebound to >400 have occurred in simplification patients versus one in the
control case. However, 2 simplfication and 3 control patients have had a viral
measurement >50 at week 16. It is not known if these represent ëblipsí or
not. Two simplification patients and one control have reported renal calculi
[6]. This may have been expected given the peak indinavir levels reported for
this regimen are around 80% higher than with tid dosing.
The
pharmacokinetics of some NNRTIs and nucleoside analogues favour once daily (QD)
dosing. Results of a Spanish study evaluating once daily ddI and nevirapine
versus twice daily dosing, in each case with stavudine in asymptomatic
antiretroviral naive HIV-1 infected patients with CD4+ T cell count >500 x
106/L and viral load > 5000 copies /ml were also discussed today.
Patients were randomly assigned to QD (N = 45) or BID (N = 44). Baseline
characteristic were not presented. The mean reduction in VL at month 12 was
-1.84 (QD) versus -1.78 (BID) (p = 0.91) with the proportion
of patients below 200 c/ml at 12 months by
intent-to-treat (ITT)
analysis being 73% (QD) and 68% (BID), and below 5 c/ml: (ITT) 40% (QD) and
45% (BID). No differences in CD4 count increase was observed.
Tonsillar biopsies were performed in a subset of 11 patients with a
plasma VL at month 12 below 5 copies/ml, 5 had detectable lymphoid VL (median:
7750 c/mg of tissue, range: 1020-33077). Eight percent of patients changed
treatment due to side effects [7].
Whilst
data support the use of once daily ddI and nevirapine in antiretroviral naive
patients the lymphoid viral load data raise some concerns regarding the
potential durability of this response.
Another
novel approach to once daily dosing was to combine the two once daily NNRTIs,
efavirenz and nevirapine with ddI. The idea behind combining NNRTIs is that the
total NNRTI exposure will be increased, potentially leading to additive
antiviral effects. Limiting the nucleoside analogue load in this regimen may
also have long term tolerability advantages. This study evaluated fifteen
treatment-naive and 11 treatment-experienced
patients. Treatment was NVP (400 mg qd) plus EFV
(600 mg qd) plus ddI (400 mg qd), thus no adjustment for a
pharmacokinetic interaction which diminished efavirenz exposure around 30% was
made ( in an ongoing study of this combination efavirenz is dosed at 800mg/day
with standard dose nevirapine). Amongst the treatment-naive
patients the mean baseline VL was 4.59 log10 copies/mL, and
the mean baseline CD4+ was 351
cells/mm3; after 9 months of therapy, 12/12 evaluable patients had VL
<400 copies/mL, and CD4+ had
increased by mean 351 cells/mm3. At baseline, 9/11
treatment-experienced patients had a VL <400 copies/mL, and mean CD4+ of 368
cells/mm3; after 9 months, 9/9 had VL <400 copies/mL , and CD4+
had increased by mean 203
cells/mm3. Five of the 26 patients (19%) discontinued
therapy, 2 for rash, 3 for CNS effects. This pilot study suggest that a
double NNRTI therapy is a
potentiall attractive approach and further evaluation of once-daily NVP+EFV+ddI
is warranted.
1.
Reijers MH, Weverling GJ, Jurriaans S, Wit
FW, Weigel HM, Ten Kate RW et al.
Maintenance therapy after quadruple induction therapy in HIV-1 infected
individuals: Amsterdam Duration of Antiretroviral Medication (ADAM) study. Lancet
1998; 352: 185ñ190.
2.
Havlir DV, Marschner IC, Hirsch MS,
Collier AC, Tebas P, Bassett RL et al.
Maintenance antiretroviral therapies in HIV-1 infected subjects with
undetectable plasma HIV RNA after triple-drug therapy.N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 1261ñ8.
3.
Pialoux G, Raffi F, Brun-Vezinet F, MeiffrÈdy
V, Flandre P, Gastaut JA et al. A
randomized trial of three maintenance regimens given after three months of
induction therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir in previously
untreated HIV-1 infected patients.N Eng J
Med 1998; 339: 1269ñ1276.
4.
Reijers
MH, Weverling GJ, Jurriaans S, et al.
The ADAM study: maintenance therapy after 50 weeks of
induction therapy. XIII International AIDS Conference,
Durban, July 9-14, 2000: abstract
TuPpA1154
5.
Saah A,
39th ICAAC
6.
Maggiolo F, Rizzi M,
Finazzi G, Suter F Once-a-day indinavir therapy in virologically controlled HIV+
persons . XIII International AIDS Conference,
Durban, July 9-14, 2000: abstract TuPpA1155
7.
Felipe G, Hernando
K, Maria Antonia S, et al. An open randomized study comparing d4T + ddI and
nevirapine (Qd) vs d4T + ddI and nevirapine (Bid) in antiretroviral naive
chronic HIV-1 infected patients in very early stages: Spanish scan study. Final
results. XIII
International AIDS Conference, Durban, July 9-14, 2000: abstract TuPpA1156
8.
Jordan W, Jefferson
R, Yemofio F, et al. Nevirapine (NVP) + efavirenz (EFV) + didanosine (ddI): a
very simple, safe, and effective once-daily regimen. XIII
International AIDS Conference, Durban, July 9-14, 2000: abstract TuPeB3207.