Efaviranz
+ d4T/3TC: 84-week data; open-label, single arm study
This is
an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of efavirenz plus d4T and 3TC in
treatment-naÔve individuals. This study compares virologic responses for
persons above and below 100,000 copies/ml at baseline, and also compares
responses for people with high or low CD4s at baseline. About 90% of the
participants were men, and 46% were black. The mean HIV viral load at baseline
was 5.50 log (316,000 copies/ml) in the group with >100,000 copies/ml and
their mean CD4 was 209; while, it was 4.42 log (26,000 copies/ml) for
individuals with <100,000 copies/ml, and their mean CD4 was 273. This was a
48 week study which was extended another 48 weeks.
For
those individuals with >200 CD4s at baseline, their mean CD4 and viral load
were 479 and 41,700 copies/ml. For those with <200 CD4s at baseline their
mean CD4 and viral load were 68 and 251,000 copies/ml. Otherwise, there didn't
appear to be any important differences between these groups including racial and
gender composition.
ANALYSIS:
Observed
Data: Patients with viral load or CD4 measures available at timepoint were
analyzed. If information was missing for any reason, person's data is not
included
ITT
NC=F: Patients with viral load >level of quantification at previous or
subsequent timepoint were considered a failure at that timepoint. If viral load
measure was missing who achieved viral load below level of quantification at
previous & subsequent timepoints are not considered from numerator or
denominator.
% <50 copies/ml at 84 Weeks |
|
-All patients- ITT- | 73% (n=64) |
-All patients- OD- | 89% (n=53) |
<100,000 copies/ml-ITT- | 76% (n=43) |
>100,000 copies/ml-ITT- | 70% (n=25) |
>100,000-Observed Data- | 84% (n=19) |
<200 CD4s- ITT- | 75% (n=16) |
<200 CD4s- OD- | 86% (n=14) |
<100 CD4s- | 50% (4/8) preliminary data at week 72 |
The
differences in response between patients with baseline viral loads „100,000
copies/ml and those with baseline viral loads <100,000 copies/ml were not
statistically significant. A mean increase from baseline in CD4 count was 288
(p<0.001).
% <400 copies/ml at 84 Weeks | |
-All patients- ITT- | 78% (n=53) |
-All patients- OD- | 94% (n=53) |
>100,000 copies/ml -ITT- | 74% (n=23) |
>100,000 copies/ml -OD- | 90% (n=19) |
<200 CD4 - ITT- | 81% (n=16) |
<200 CD4 - OD- | 93% (n=14) |
Overall,
mean CD4s increased by 318 from baseline. When baseline CD4 >200 increase was
337, and 269 for those with <200 CD4s at baseline.
Reported Adverse Events „ Grade 2: | |
Of 68 study particpants 30 (44%) had an AE „grade 2. | |
Abdominal Pain | 4 (6%) |
Dizziness | 4 (6%) |
Headache | 4 (6%) |
Nausea | 4 (6%) |
Concentration Impaired | 3 (4%) |
Dreaming Abnormal | 3 (4%) |
Diarrhea | 2 (3%) |
Fatigue | 2 (3%) |
GGT Increased | 2 (3%) |
Hypertriglyceridemia | 2 (3%) |
Insomnia | 2 (3%) |
Peripheral Nueropathy |
2 (3%) |
Rash Maculo-papular | 2 (3%) |
Generalized | 2 (3%) |
Vomiting | 2 (3%) |