|
|
|
|
Pharmacokinetics of the next-generation NNRTI etravirine (ETR; TMC125) in HIV-infected children between 6 and 17 years, inclusive
|
|
|
Reported by Jules Levin
CROI 200, Boston
Thomas N Kakuda,1 Christoph Konigs,2 Cornelia Feiterna-Sperling,3 Claudio Viscoli,4 Raffaella Rosso,4 Rekha Sinha,5 Ingeborg Peeters,5 Monika Peeters,5 Katrien Janssen,5 Richard MW Hoetelmans,5 Katia Boven1
1Tibotec, Inc, Yardley, PA, USA; 2J W Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; 3Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; 4Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino, Genoa, Italy;
5Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium
Abstract
Background
ETR is a next-generation NNRTI that has demonstrated significant antiviral activity in two large Phase III trials, DUET-1 and 2, conducted in HIV-infected adults with evidence of NNRTI resistance. Pediatric dosing of ETR has not yet been established. The objective of this study is to determine the weight-based dose of ETR that will achieve exposures in children comparable to those in adults.
Methods
HIV-1-infected children between 6 and < /=17 years with at least two consecutive viral loads of <50 copies/mL on a lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing regimen,
were enrolled. ETR 4mg/kg bid was added for 7 days followed by a morning dose and 12-hour pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment on Day 8. Both 25 and 100mg tablets were used. ETR PK was assessed using non-compartmental analysis; Cmin and AUC12h were compared to parameters previously established in adults administered 200mg bid on a LPV/r-containing regimen. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study up to 30 days postdosing.
Results
Seventeen children were enrolled in the study; PK data were available in 16: 10 between the ages of 6 and < 12 and six between the ages of >/=12 and =17. The mean (standard deviation; SD) Cmax and Cmin in 16 children were 555.2 (514.6) ng/mL and 233.2 (237.9) ng/mL, respectively. Mean (SD) AUC12h was
evaluable in 15 children and was 4788 (4459) ng·h/mL. Relative to adults, the least square means ratio (90% CI [confidence interval]) for Cmin and AUC12h
was 1.08 (0.69-1.69) and 1.11 (0.76-1.62), respectively. Intersubject PK variability was greater in children compared to adults, primarily as a result of
one outlier. The range of exposures observed in children with the outlier removed was similar to that observed in adults. Exposure was not associated with age or body surface area (BSA). No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred;12 children reported at least one AE, mostly grade 1 or 2. Two children developed a rash (grade 1 and grade 2, respectively), both on Day 8 and resolving after 5-6 days; the AUC12h in these children were 7408 and 1826ng ·h/mL, respectively.
Author Conclusions
· ETR administered at 4mg/kg bid following a meal provides comparable exposure in children (age 6-17, inclusive) to 200mg bid in adults
· ETR was generally safe and well tolerated
- two patients developed a transient rash of mild-to-moderate severity
- no apparent association with ETR exposure (AUC12h)
· Given the general concern for under dosing of antiretrovirals in children5,6 and lack of safety signal during Stage I, Stage II of this trial with a 30% higher dose (5.2mg/kg bid) was started and recruitment is ongoing
· A Phase II trial to further determine pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy in
treatment-experienced children will begin after final dose selection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|