icon-folder.gif   Conference Reports for NATAP  
 
  Infectious Disease Societyof America (IDSA)
47th Annual Meeting
Philadelphia, PA
October 29 - November 1, 2009
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
 
(IDSA) Darunavir, Ritonavir, and Etravirine Steady-state Pharmacokinetics in the Cervicovaginal Fluid and Blood Plasma of HIV-infected Women Enrolled in the GRACE Study
 
 
  Reported by Jules Levin
47th annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Philadelphia, PA, USA, October 29 to November 1, 2009
 
Kristine Patterson1, Naser Rezk1, Steven Jennings1, Ron Falcon2, Joseph Mrus2, Angela Kashuba1
 
1University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA; 2Tibotec Therapeutics, Bridgewater, NJ
 

image002.gif

DRV and ETR achieve CVF exposures 150% and 130% higher, respectively, than BP in pre- and postmenopausal women
 
Further research is warranted to defi ne the effect of DRV and ETR on HIV-1 RNA in genital secretions
 

image004.gif

To date, DRV and ETR achieved among the highest penetration into CVF of other protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, respectively3-5 (Figure 5)
 

image006.gif

aAdapted from Dumond et al., 20073. N(t)RTI, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; PI, protease inhibitor; AUCGT, genital tract area under the curve; AUCBP, blood plasma area under the curve; ND, not detected; 3TC, lamivudine; MVC, maraviroc; FTC, emtricitibine; ZDV, zidovudine; IDV, indinavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ETR, etravirine; DRV, darunavir; RAL, raltegravir; NVP, nevirapine; APV, amprenavir; RTV, ritonavir; ddl, didanosine; DLV, delavirdine; ATV, atazanavir; ABC, abacavir; LPV, lopinavir; d4t, stavudine; EFV, efavirenz; SQV, saquinavir
 
DRV exposure in the female genital tract is 1.5-fold higher than in BP
- This CVF exposure is 3- to 20-fold higher than other protease inhibitors with the exception of indinavir
 
Ritonavir exposure in the female genital tract is higher in this study than in previous evaluations
 
ETR exposure in the female genital tract is 1.3-fold higher than in BP, unlike efavirenz, which shows minimal penetration into CVF3
 
For DRV, there was no difference in CVF and BP exposure between pre- and postmenopausal women; however, only two out of eight women were postmenopausal
 
The role of DRV and ETR in primary prevention remains uncertain as this study did not evaluate first dose PK.
 
Nonetheless, the concentrations measured are similar to other agents being investigated for primary prevention3-5
 
INTRODUCTION
 
Antiretroviral (ARV) therapy can be used in HIV prevention strategies - Primary prevention through pre-exposure prophylaxis or post-exposure prophylaxis
- Secondary prevention through the decrease of HIV replication in the genital secretions of HIV-infected individuals
 
Both prevention strategies depend on adequate penetration of ARVs into the genital tract
 
GRACE (Gender, Race And Clinical Experience) is the largest ARV trial to focus on women with HIV-1 in North America, and was designed to assess sex and race differences in effi cacy, safety and tolerability of darunavir/ ritonavir (DRV/r) plus an optimized background regimen over 48 weeks in treatment-experienced patients1
 
The aim of this prospective substudy was to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) of DRV, ritonavir and etravirine (ETR) in female cervicovaginal fluid (CVF) and blood plasma (BP) in HIV-infected women from the GRACE study.
 
We also investigated the effect of menopause on both CVF and BP ARV PK
 
METHODS
 
The GRACE study design

 
GRACE was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, Phase IIIb study conducted at 65 sites across the United States, Puerto Rico and Canada, which enrolled treatment-experienced patients (viral load ≥1000 HIV-RNA copies/mL) aged ≥18 years with documented HIV-1 infection (Figure 1)
 

image008.gif

image010.gif

aPatients were allowed to enter the study on treatment interruption of ≥4 weeks; bInvestigator-selected nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and NNRTIs included; ENF, TPV or agents from novel classes were not allowed; PI, protease inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; HAART, highly-active antiretroviral therapy; DRV/r, darunavir/ritonavir; ETR, etravirine; ENF, enfuvirtide; TPV, tipranavir; bid, twice daily; OBR, optimized background regimen
 

image012.gif

image014.gif

aNo postmenopausal women received etravirine; IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; OBR, optimized background regimen

image016.gif

image018.gif

image020.gif

image022.gif

image024.gif

image026.gif

DRV, darunavir; RTV, ritonavir; IQR, interquartile range; BP, blood plasma; CVF, cervicovaginal fl uid; Cmax, maximum concentration in plasma; Tmax, time to maximum concentration; AUC, area under the curve
 
References
 
1. Squires K, et al. Poster Presented at the 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention. July 19-22, 2009, Cape Town, South Africa. Poster MOPEB042
2. Rezk NL, et al. Talanta 2009; 79(5): 1372-8
3. Dumond JB, et al. AIDS 2007; 21: 1899-907
4. Dumond JB, et al. J Acquir Immune Defi c Syndr 2009; 51: 546-53
5. Jones A, et al. Presented at the 10th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy. April 15-17, 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Platform presentation