icon-folder.gif   Conference Reports for NATAP  
 
  Infectious Disease Societyof America (IDSA)
47th Annual Meeting
Philadelphia, PA
October 29 - November 1, 2009
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
 
(IDSA) Predictors of Response in GRACE (Gender, Race And Clinical Experience)
 
 
  Reported by Jules Levin
47th Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, October 29 to November 1, 2009
 
Princy Kumar, MD1, Judith Currier, MD, MSc2, Kathleen Squires, MD3, Joseph Mrus, MD, MSc4, Bruce Coate, BS, MPH5, and Robert Ryan, MS5, on behalf of the GRACE Study Group 1Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA; 2University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 3Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 4Tibotec Therapeutics, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 5Tibotec, Inc., Yardley, PA, USA
 
"Black race was correlated with lower response in the final multivariate model; however, in North America, race is likely a surrogate for other factors both measured and not measured in GRACE; Black patients had numerically lower adherence rates (63.3%) than Hispanics (66.7%) or Caucasians (73.9%), which may have contributed to their lower response rate. Black patients had more advanced disease at baseline than the other groups, which, among other potential reasons, could reflect differences in care and may have led to increased treatment complexity Lower response rates in blacks in GRACE may have been due to socioeconomic and other factors unique to North America. participation at a study site with limited experience in conducting a clinical trial and ETR in the OBR were predictors of improved response in GRACE These factors may include lower health literacy, more poverty or incarceration, or higher levels of depression. The HEAT study, another North-American based trial, also observed this correlation between race and virologic response"
 
AUTHOR CONCLUSIONS

 
In the final multivariate model, ≥95% adherence, lower baseline VL, race/ ethnicity other than black, older age, no GI medical history, participation at a study site with limited experience in conducting a clinical trial and ETR in the OBR were predictors of improved response in GRACE
- Some of these covariates are likely surrogate markers for other variables both measured and not measured in GRACE that could affect response
- Further investigation into factors that may impact race-based differences in response rates, such as pharmacokinetics, differences in care, socioeconomic disparities, health literacy and adherence, is warranted
 
Sex was not identified in the multivariate analysis as a significant predictor of response to DRV/r plus an OBR at Week 48 in GRACE
 
AUTHOR DISCUSSION
 
The multivariate analysis performed on the overall GRACE population, which accounted for differences in baseline characteristics, confirmed that sex was not a significant predictor of response at Week 48
 
Adherence of ≥95%, and lower baseline VL were the covariates most significantly correlated with response in the final multivariate model (P<.0001 for both), as has been previously observed in other HIV clinical trials3-6
 
- Poor adherence can lead to inadequate drug exposure and, in turn, VF and the potential development of antiretroviral resistance7
 
- Paterson et al showed that >95% adherence to PI therapy resulted in increased efficacy8
 
Older age was a significant predictor of response at Week 48 in GRACE, mirroring reports from previous trials showing that younger age can be a predictor of VF5,9
 
- Older age has been associated with improved adherence compared with younger age in other studies10; however, age and adherence were not strongly related in GRACE (data not shown) and, in the multivariate model, the association between age and response was present even after accounting for differences in adherence
 
'Participation at a study site with limited experience in conducting clinical trials' and 'no gastrointestinal (GI) medical history' may relate to more complex personal characteristics, interactions or variables not fully captured in GRACE
 
Association between use of ETR and improved response suggests that this combination with DRV/r-based therapy is efficacious in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1; further interpretation is limited due to the lack of randomization of ETR use in GRACE
 
Black race was correlated with lower response in the final multivariate model; however, in North America, race is likely a surrogate for other factors both measured and not measured in GRACE
 
- Black patients had numerically lower adherence rates (63.3%) than Hispanics (66.7%) or Caucasians (73.9%), which may have contributed to their lower response rate; however, in the multivariate model, the association between black race/ethnicity and response was present even after accounting for differences in adherence
 

 
- Black patients had more advanced disease at baseline than the other groups, which, among other potential reasons, could reflect differences in care and may have led to increased treatment complexity11, 12
 
- Lower response rates in blacks in GRACE may have been due to socioeconomic and other factors unique to North America. These factors may include lower health literacy, more poverty or incarceration, or higher levels of depression11
 
- The HEAT study, another North-American based trial, also observed this correlation between race and virologic response13
 
Background
·; GRACE, a multicenter, open-label, Phase IIIb study (Figure 1) was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) plus an investigator-selected optimized background regimen (OBR) in treatment-experienced women
infected with HIV-1 in comparison to treatment-experienced HIV-positive men1
- Enrollment into the study was planned to ensure that the racial/ethnic distribution of the women in GRACE was representative of the demographics of this population in the United States (US)1,2
- At each study site, three women were enrolled prior to enrollment of one male patient1, and the number of Caucasian men enrolled was limited
 

image002.gif

Virologic response (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was calculated using a time-to- loss of virologic response (TLOVR) algorithm in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included patients who took at least one dose of study medication, and in the non-virologic failure (VF) censored population, which adjusted for discontinuations that were not due to VF
 
A total of 429 patients (women, n=287; men, n=142) were enrolled in GRACE and received at least one dose of study drug
 
At Week 48, the virologic response rate was 53.4% in the ITT population and 73.2% in the non-VF censored population. The response rates at Week 48 by sex and race are shown in Table 1
 

image004.gif

We present data from a post-hoc exploratory analysis, conducted to investigate factors predictive of virologic response in the ITT population at Week 48
- In particular, given the demographics of patients enrolled in GRACE, we wanted to investigate whether sex or race were predictors of response

image006.gif

image008.gif

image010.gif

image012.gif

image014.gif

image016.gif

image018.gif

image020.gif

image022.gif

REFERENCES
 
1. Squires K, et al. GRACE (Gender, Race And Clinical Experience): 48-week results of darunavir/r-based therapy in the largest trial in North America to focus in treatment-experienced women. Presented at the 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention, Cape Town, South Africa, July 19-22, 2009. Poster MOPEB042
 
2. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS surveillance report. Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States and Dependent Areas, 2007, Vol. 19. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/ resources/reports/2007report/pdf/2007SurveillanceReport.pdf. Accessed September 14, 2009
 
3. Campo RE, et al. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2009; 25(3): 269-75
 
4. Quiros-Roldan E, et al. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2007; 21(2): 92-9
 
5. Tuboi SH, et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2005; 40(3): 324-8
 
6. Cahn P, et al. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20(7): 1115-23
 
7. Bangsberg DR, et al. AIDS 2006; 20: 223-31
 
8. Paterson DL, et al. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133(1): 21-30
 
9. Parienti JJ, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38(9): 1311-6
 
10. Maggiolo F, et al. HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3(5): 371-8
 
11. Cargill A and Stone V. Med Clin N Am 2005; 89: 895-912
 
12. Turner BJ, et al. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 2614-22
 
13. Smith KY, et al. Poster presented at the 5th International AIDS Society conference on HIV pathogenesis, treatment and prevention. July 19-22, 2009, Cape Town, South Africa. Poster MOPEB033