icon-    folder.gif   Conference Reports for NATAP  
 
  IAS 2015: 8th IAS Conference on
HIV Pathogenesis Treatment and Prevention
Vancouver, Canada
18-22 July 2015
Back grey_arrow_rt.gif
 
 
 
Can the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target be achieved? Analysis of 12 national level HIV treatment cascades
 
 
  Download the PDF here
 
Reported by Jules Levin
IAS 2015 Vancouver July 19-23
Presented by Jacob Levi
 
J. Levi1, A. Raymond1, A. Pozniak2, P. Vernazza3, P. Kohler3, A. Hill2 1Imperial College London, School of Public Health, London, United Kingdom, 2St. Stephens Centre, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, St. Gallen, Switzerland
 
WEBCAST: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smqPzaj5jiw
 
Program Abstract
 
Background: In 2014, UNAIDS set the "90-90-90" targets; aiming to diagnose 90% of all HIV positive people, provide antiretroviral therapy for 90% of those diagnosed and achieve undetectable HIV RNA for 90% of those on treatment by 2020. This translates to at least 73% of all HIV positive people achieving undetectable HIV RNA. Comparing national level HIV treatment cascades, we evaluate how far countries are towards achieving these targets.
 
Methods: We compared published estimates of HIV treatment cascades across 12 countries and one region. Data were selected based on reliable, generalizable, recently published results from large cross-sectional and longitudinal study cohorts. Cascades were split into six stages; 1-Total HIV positive people, 2-Diagnosed as HIV positive, 3-Linked to care, 4-Retained in care, 5-On antiretroviral treatment, 6-Undetectable HIV-RNA. Each cascade was analysed to identify ''breakpoints'': defined as a drop >10% in coverage of care between consecutive 90-90-90 UNAIDS stages.
 
Results: The percentage of HIV positive people whom achieved undetectable HIV RNA ranged from 68% [Switzerland] to 9% [Russia]. No cascade analysed met the UNAIDS final target of 73% achieving undetectable HIV RNA. Cascades were heterogeneity as reporting methodology and stage definitions varied between countries e.g. definitions of viral suppression ranged from < 50 - < 1000 RNA copies/ml. While five Western European countries achieved >50% undetectable HIV RNA, three Eastern European countries achieved < 20% undetectable HIV RNA. The most significant breakpoints in treatment cascades were at diagnosis (for Switzerland, UK, Netherlands, sub-Saharan Africa, and Russia) receiving Antiretroviral Therapy (for Australia, Brazil, USA, Georgia and Estonia) and achieving undetectable HIV RNA (France and Canada).

IAS1.gif

Conclusions: No country or region analysed met the UNAIDS 90-90-90 coverage target of 73% of HIV positive people achieving undetectable HIV RNA. Large disparities were identified between countries, even within Europe. In order to facilitate comparisons between countries and to better identify gaps and inform policy, a standardized reporting method should be implemented.
 
------------------
 
In conclusion,
No country yet meets the final UNAIDS target of 73% achieving viral suppression. This is the most important category for achieving individual good health but also reducing transmission and ending the epidemic.
Large disparities exist, especially between western and eastern Europe. Although all cascades are constructed from the most reliable and largest available national data sources, comparison between countries is difficult because of high heterogeneity in reporting methods and definitions of stages between countries.
In 2020 the UNAIDS targets will increase from 90% to 95% for each of the three categories as a fast-track to end the epidemic by 2030.
Currently diagnosis remains the largest breakpoint globally and therefore we need to focus on testing.
Identifying breakpoints allows us to prioritize resources to fix them. We conclude that to measure progress annually and facilitate comparison between countries, which is extremely important to ending the epidemic, a standardized reporting methodology should be implemented.

IAS2.gif

IAS3.gif

IAS4.gif

IAS5.gif

IAS6.gif

IAS7.gif

IAS8.gif

IAS9.gif

IAS10.gif

IAS11.gif

IAS12.gif

IAS13.gif

IAS14.gif

IAS15.gif

IAS16.gif

IAS17.gif

IAS18.gif

IAS19.gif

IAS20.gif

IAS21.gif

IAS22.gif

IAS23.gif

IAS24.gif

IAS25.gif

IAS26.gif

IAS27.gif

IAS28.gif

IAS29.gif

Refs:
 
http://www.aidsdatahub.org/sites/default/files/highlight-reference/document/Metrics_for_monitoring_the_cascade_2014.pdf
 
http://applications.emro.who.int/dsaf/EMROPUB_2014_EN_1639.pdf
 
http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/JC2702_GARPR2015guidelines_en.pdf

IAS30.gif