data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7877f/7877f29bc7a2f14a53d709a705d791503b0ebed4" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7877f/7877f29bc7a2f14a53d709a705d791503b0ebed4" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7877f/7877f29bc7a2f14a53d709a705d791503b0ebed4" alt="" |
|
Cost per Sustained Virological Response 4 (SVR 4) in Genotype 1 Patients Treated With Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir With and Without Ribavirin. A Detailed Cost-Mapping Study
|
|
|
Reported by Jules Levin
DDW 2016 May 22-24 San Diego, CA
Lisa M. Nyberg1, Kevin M. Chiang3, Santiago Lindsay4, T. Craig Cheetham5, Ekaterina Sadikova5, Jiaxiao M. Shi5, Zobair M. Younossi2, Anders H. Nyberg1
1 Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, United States; 2 Medicine, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia, United States; 3 Pharmacy Analytical Services, Kaiser Permanente, Downey, California, United States; 4 Finance Analytics, Decision Support, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California, United States; 5 Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California, United States
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1e05/f1e05ddb1609ef96fbca9db888a6eb2d10070c40" alt="Clin1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c8bb/6c8bb52ce8303a6056a0ef520515d94060204b68" alt="Clin2"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/680e2/680e2b12d7377b6c142f0e98960114abe5725515" alt="Clin3"
Costs of telaprevir-based triple therapy for hepatitis C: $189,000 per sustained virological response......
http://www.natap.org/2014/HCV/092914_01.htm
AASLD/Costs of Telaprevir-based Triple Therapy Including Adverse Event Management at the Mount Sinai Medical Center, NY $189,000 per
SVR.......
http://www.natap.org/2013/AASLD/AASLD_103.htm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/318d9/318d947e35f896af2d136eee039443d629b692da" alt="Clin4"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50719/5071926257a0435770644c9bbcfb64eae6d57c03" alt="Clin5"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28a0a/28a0a3f35da8d094c7868c6768d784b6539fd6f4" alt="Clin6"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9b2b/d9b2be5c3c28907cf957abacd0fea93ef8343568" alt="Clin7"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61f24/61f24e8a339f042637660c308e274311d5477c22" alt="Clin8"
In the 8 week "cirrhotic" grp tx with Led/Sof, 60% were actually not cirrhotic - they were defined as cirrhotic by APRI score alone. The grp of cirrhotic tx w 8 w led/Sof + riba were really sick and several stopped early and needed OLT eval. A couple rolled over from receiving Sof+ riba after led/Sof was approved. That's why they received < 12 w tx with led/Sof. Finally, in the grp of Led/Sof + riba x 24 w Again, very sick with several hospitalizations and txp evals thus the high cost. In the standard 12 w Rx grps, excellent SVR and cost/SVR for Rx is 90% drug for non-cirrhotics and 81% for cirrhotics. Remember, it is also by WAC.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7877f/7877f29bc7a2f14a53d709a705d791503b0ebed4" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7877f/7877f29bc7a2f14a53d709a705d791503b0ebed4" alt="" |
|
|