| |
Short-term outcomes for lung cancer
resection surgery in HIV infection
|
| |
| |
Download the PDF here
Conclusions: In a national antiretroviral-era cohort of lung cancer patients undergoing surgical lung resection, short-term outcomes after surgery did not differ significantly by HIV status. Concerns regarding short-term surgical complications should have limited influence on treatment decisions for PWH with lung cancer.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and a major source of morbidity among persons living with HIV infection (PWH) in the United States [1,2]. The significant lung cancer burden observed among PWH is partly attributable to high smoking rates in this group, but also due to independent, HIV-related factors increasing lung cancer risk [3].
-------Several recent population-based studies have found lower rates of stage-appropriate lung cancer treatment (including surgery) in individuals with HIV infection, with differences ranging from 12 to 17% [5,7,20]. A survey of oncologic providers found that a majority of clinicians felt there was insufficient guidance regarding appropriate cancer treatment for PWH, and that concerns regarding adverse effects and efficacy of cancer treatments deterred appropriate therapy for PWH [21]. In contrast, we found no differences in the use of surgical resection (the gold standard treatment) for early-stage lung cancer among veterans. As the VACS cohort enrolls all PWH veterans engaged in care, our findings are likely an accurate picture of treatment patterns for this group within the VA system, but may not necessarily represent the experiences of PWH less engaged in medical care.
Appropriate lung cancer treatment is dictated by cancer stage, tumor characteristics, and patient factors. Overall, approximately 35% of lung cancer cases in PWH are diagnosed at a potentially resectable (I-IIIA) cancer stage [5,10]. However, adoption of lung cancer screening among PWH smokers [11-13] will substantially increase the proportion of resectable cancers [14]. Optimal management of early-stage lung cancer is therefore critical, as these are the only patients for whom long-term survival can be achieved [15]. Surgical resection is the major component of lung cancer treatment for stage I-IIIA, and can be curative in some circumstances.
The short-term risks of lung cancer surgery in PWH are unknown. Improved understanding of these risks is critical for clinical decision-making regarding the use of optimal lung cancer treatment in this group, and may help addressing treatment disparities.
------Surgical resection for early-stage lung cancer is potentially curative. The burden of lung cancer among PWH is expected to grow [18], and with increases in lung cancer screening, the prevalence of localized cancers is also likely to increase in this group [19]. Establishing the safety of lung cancer surgery in PWH is important to decrease existing disparities in cancer treatment. In our study of PWH and uninfected veterans with lung cancer, we did not find significant differences in the utilization of major surgical resection by HIV status in patients with early stage lung cancer in a well matched cohort, suggesting that in the VA system there are limited disparities in the use of lung cancer surgery in patients with HIV. Additionally, using prospectively collected surgical outcomes data, and we found no major differences in postsurgical adverse events according to HIV status. These findings suggest that concerns regarding short-term surgical outcomes associated with the presence of HIV infection should not play a role in treatment decision-making.
-----In conclusion, in a national ART-era cohort of PWH and uninfected lung cancer patients undergoing surgical lung cancer resection, short-term outcomes after surgery did not differ significantly by HIV status. Concern for short-term surgical complications related to HIV infection should have limited influence on treatment decisions for PWH with lung cancer.
-------------------
Short-term outcomes for lung cancer resection surgery in HIV infection
Sigel, Keith M.a; Stone, Kimberlya; Wisnivesky, Juan P.a; Park, Lesley S.b; Kong, Chung Yinc; Silverberg, Michael J.d,e; Brown, Sheldona,f; Goetz, Matthewg,h; Rodriguez-Barradas, Maria C.i; Gibert, Cynthiaj; Shebl, Fatmak; Bedimo, Rogerl; Wadia, Roxannem; King, Joseph Jr.m,n; Crothers, Kristinao
AIDS: July 1, 2019
Objective: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in people living with HIV (PWH). Surgical resection is a key component of potentially curative treatment regimens for early-stage lung cancers, but its safety is unclear in the setting of HIV. From a national cohort, we assessed potential differences in the risk of major lung cancer surgery complications by HIV status.
Design: We linked clinical and cancer data from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) and Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse to outcomes from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and identified 8371 patients (137 PWH, 8234 uninfected) who underwent lung cancer surgeries between 2000 and 2016.
Methods: We compared rates of 15 major short-term surgical complications by HIV status.
Results:
Use of surgical resection for early-stage lung cancer did not differ by HIV status. Lung cancer surgery postoperative (30-day) mortality was 2.0% for PWH and did not differ by HIV status (P = 0.9).
Pneumonia was the most common complication for both PWH and uninfected veterans, but did not differ significantly in prevalence between groups (11.0% for PWH versus 9.4%; P = 0.5).
The frequency of complications did not differ by HIV status for any complication (all P > 0.3). There were no significant predictors of postoperative complications for PWH.
Conclusions: In a national antiretroviral-era cohort of lung cancer patients undergoing surgical lung resection, short-term outcomes after surgery did not differ significantly by HIV status. Concerns regarding short-term surgical complications should have limited influence on treatment decisions for PWH with lung cancer.
Background
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death and a major source of morbidity among persons living with HIV infection (PWH) in the United States [1,2]. The significant lung cancer burden observed among PWH is partly attributable to high smoking rates in this group, but also due to independent, HIV-related factors increasing lung cancer risk [3].
Despite major improvements in health outcomes during the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era, PWH experience worse lung cancer survival compared to uninfected persons [4]. The reasons for these poorer outcomes are unclear, but may be associated with disparities in lung cancer care [5]. Population-based studies have shown lower rates of lung cancer treatment in PWH than uninfected individuals [5-7]. These disparities may be related to clinician apprehension regarding increased risks of treatment-related complications (particularly major surgery-related adverse events) among PWH [8,9].
Appropriate lung cancer treatment is dictated by cancer stage, tumor characteristics, and patient factors. Overall, approximately 35% of lung cancer cases in PWH are diagnosed at a potentially resectable (I-IIIA) cancer stage [5,10]. However, adoption of lung cancer screening among PWH smokers [11-13] will substantially increase the proportion of resectable cancers [14]. Optimal management of early-stage lung cancer is therefore critical, as these are the only patients for whom long-term survival can be achieved [15]. Surgical resection is the major component of lung cancer treatment for stage I-IIIA, and can be curative in some circumstances.
The short-term risks of lung cancer surgery in PWH are unknown. Improved understanding of these risks is critical for clinical decision-making regarding the use of optimal lung cancer treatment in this group, and may help addressing treatment disparities. In this study, we used data from a national cohort of PWH and uninfected comparators in the Veterans Health Administration to evaluate the use of and short-term outcomes for lung cancer surgery, hypothesizing that in the ART era PWH with lung cancer would experience similar harms associated with surgery compared to demographically similar uninfected patients.
Discussion
Surgical resection for early-stage lung cancer is potentially curative. The burden of lung cancer among PWH is expected to grow [18], and with increases in lung cancer screening, the prevalence of localized cancers is also likely to increase in this group [19]. Establishing the safety of lung cancer surgery in PWH is important to decrease existing disparities in cancer treatment. In our study of PWH and uninfected veterans with lung cancer, we did not find significant differences in the utilization of major surgical resection by HIV status in patients with early stage lung cancer in a well matched cohort, suggesting that in the VA system there are limited disparities in the use of lung cancer surgery in patients with HIV. Additionally, using prospectively collected surgical outcomes data, and we found no major differences in postsurgical adverse events according to HIV status. These findings suggest that concerns regarding short-term surgical outcomes associated with the presence of HIV infection should not play a role in treatment decision-making.
Several recent population-based studies have found lower rates of stage-appropriate lung cancer treatment (including surgery) in individuals with HIV infection, with differences ranging from 12 to 17% [5,7,20]. A survey of oncologic providers found that a majority of clinicians felt there was insufficient guidance regarding appropriate cancer treatment for PWH, and that concerns regarding adverse effects and efficacy of cancer treatments deterred appropriate therapy for PWH [21]. In contrast, we found no differences in the use of surgical resection (the gold standard treatment) for early-stage lung cancer among veterans. As the VACS cohort enrolls all PWH veterans engaged in care, our findings are likely an accurate picture of treatment patterns for this group within the VA system, but may not necessarily represent the experiences of PWH less engaged in medical care. As the VA is the largest single provider of HIV care in the United States, it is possible that providers have a higher comfort level in treating this population, possibly explaining the differences that have been seen with other population-based studies. Alternatively, some sociodemographic groups that are over-represented among the US PWH (minorities, lower-income persons) may experience structural barriers to appropriate lung cancer treatment, and this is likely diminished within the VA system.
HIV infection has been associated with higher rates of adverse surgical outcomes in several large ART era studies. An ART era study of 332 procedure-matched pairs in Kaiser Permanente Northern California found higher rates of postoperative pneumonia among PWH, but no differences in short-term mortality [22]. A larger analysis of VACS patients compared 1641 veterans with HIV infection undergoing major surgery to procedure-matched uninfected comparators and found higher 30-day mortality associated with HIV infection after adjustment. In that study, increasing age, very low CD4+ cell count, comorbidity burden, and albumin level were all independently associated with postoperative mortality [8]. Another large study evaluated colorectal surgery outcomes from a national sample (years 2000-2010) by HIV status and found similar results; patients with an AIDS diagnosis had significantly higher postoperative mortality, and infectious and noninfectious surgical complications compared to uninfected persons [9]. Persons with HIV, but without an AIDS diagnosis, were, however, not at higher risk for mortality or complications.
Previous data on postoperative outcomes for PWH specific to lung cancer surgery are limited. An early ART-era review compiled published surgical series, finding no perioperative deaths associated with lung cancer surgery among 24 PWH (mostly cases from the pre-ART era), but 8% died within 90 days of surgery [23]. Additionally, a Baltimore-based single-center series spanning both the pre-ART and ART era compared 22 HIV+ patients (median age 47.5) who were treated with surgical resection to a matched cohort [24]. That study did not observe any perioperative deaths (0% at 30 days) for PWH, but did find very high rates of postoperative complications, with nearly half of the PWH experiencing at least two major complications. Similarly, in our ART era cohort, we found no differences in 30-day mortality by HIV status, but in contrast to the Baltimore cohort, we found no difference in the incidence of major postoperative complications associated with HIV status. The low rate of major complications likely reflects our more contemporary HIV+ cohort, with a low prevalence of uncontrolled viremia and immunosuppression.
Our study benefited from a national data source with detailed clinical data and prospectively collected short-term surgical complication information. VASQIP provides a unique opportunity to link high quality surgical data to detailed HIV clinical information that is not possible with the analogous non-VA program used by many hospitals to track 30-day surgical outcomes - American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) - that has no data on HIV status or severity. A major limitation of our study is that we could not fully account for potential selection regarding the use of surgery as treatment for the HIV+ patients and this could have biased the lack of association of HIV with adverse outcomes. However, we found no disparity in the use of surgery to treat early-stage lung cancer patients by HIV status, suggesting that there may not be major selection bias present. Additionally, we conducted adjusted analyses to account for potential differences between the PWH who underwent surgery and uninfected persons, and still found no association between HIV and postoperative mortality or major complications. We also had no data on pack-year smoking quantity or recent smoking cessation for study participants, factors that might have differed by HIV status and have been associated with lung cancer surgery complications [25].
In conclusion, in a national ART-era cohort of PWH and uninfected lung cancer patients undergoing surgical lung cancer resection, short-term outcomes after surgery did not differ significantly by HIV status.
Concern for short-term surgical complications related to HIV infection should have limited influence on treatment decisions for PWH with lung cancer.
Methods
We used data from the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) - a large cohort of PWH who, upon enrollment, are matched (by age, race/ethnicity, sex, and Veterans Affairs clinical site) to two uninfected comparators assembled from Veterans Affairs clinical and administrative data. During the years 2000-2016, we identified all cases of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within VACS (Fig. 1; n = 2206) using linked data from the Corporate Data Warehouse Oncology (CDW Oncology) repository - a national database of cancer registry information collected at VA hospitals by trained cancer registrars. We then determined which NSCLC patients from VACS underwent surgical resection (’analysis 1’; n = 520). The purpose of this analysis was to use the VACS cohort to determine the proportion of veterans who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer by HIV status, to assess for treatment disparities. In the second analysis (Fig. 1; ‘analysis 2’), we evaluated the risk of major surgical complications by HIV status, which is our primary study objective. To improve the study power for this objective, we included additional lung cancer cases by collecting all available uninfected NSCLC patients who underwent surgery during the same timeframe from the CDW Oncology registry (n = 8234). We then merged our expanded cancer cohort with data from the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP), which provided prospectively collected information on preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes for patients who underwent lung cancer surgery.
Study outcomes and variables
For our initial analysis determining the overall rate of lung cancer resection by HIV status in the VACS cohort, we used both registry data and procedure codes (which allowed identification of surgeries that occurred at non-VA hospitals) to identify lung cancer surgeries for all NSCLC patients in VACS. For our analysis of surgical complications by HIV status, our primary analytic cohort consisted of patients undergoing lung cancer resection surgery as identified by procedure codes in VASQIP. However, VASQIP data were not available for all patients, as it is only captured for surgeries performed in VA facilities.
All primary and secondary outcomes were reported in VASQIP. Our primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality after lung cancer surgery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day surgical complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis, reintubation, reoperation, and myocardial infarction.
For our analysis of surgical complications, we then collected data on age, sex, race, and ethnicity from VA administrative data. We collected comorbidity [such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)] information from all available data sources which included both relevant diagnostic codes and data recorded in VASQIP. Other preoperative variables that we included from VASQIP were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, functional status impairment, significant alcohol use, and smoking status. From linked cancer registry data, we determined cancer diagnosis date, tumor stage, and histologic subtype. For HIV+ patients we ascertained CD4+ cell count, HIV viral suppression (<500 copies/ml) and VACS index values [16], a validated prognosis score for PWH (incorporating age, CD4+ cell count, HIV viral load, aspartate transaminase concentration (AST), alanine transaminase concentration (ALT), platelet count, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin level, and hepatitis C serostatus), at the time of cancer diagnosis.
Results
In our initial analysis of stage I-IIIA NSCLC cases in the VACS cohort, we found that PWH (n = 191) were equally likely to be treated with surgical resection as uninfected veterans (191/415 = 46% for PWH vs. 329/658 = 50% for uninfected; P = 0.3; results not otherwise shown) during 2000-2016.
In the larger combined cohort (including additional comparator cases from the national VA sample), PWH lung cancer surgery patients were younger, more likely to be African-American or Hispanic, and were less likely to have COPD, but otherwise did not differ significantly in comorbid conditions, anesthesia-risk class, or functional status impairment (Table 1). The majority of PWH had viral suppression (71%) and CD4+ cell counts greater than 200 cells/μl (75%) at lung cancer diagnosis. Cancer histologic type differed by HIV status, with PWH being less likely to have squamous cell subtypes (35 versus 40%) and more likely to be categorized as undefined NSCLC (6 versus 1%; P < 0.001 for histologic subtype comparisons). Surgical procedure types also differed by HIV status; PWH were more likely to receive pneumonectomy (9 versus 4%) and less likely to undergo limited lung resection (16 versus 19%) than uninfected patients (P = 0.01).
Table 1
Perioperative mortality for NSCLC surgery was 2.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-6.3%] for PWH and 2.5% (95% CI 2.1-2.8%) for uninfected patients (P = 0.8). Major complications occurred in 17.5% of procedures for HIV+ versus 19.4% of uninfected patients (P = 0.6); none of the rates of complications significantly differed by HIV status. Common postoperative complications included pneumonia (11.0% for PWH versus 9.4% for uninfected; P = 0.5) followed by reoperation (9.5% for PWH versus 7.5%; P = 0.4) and reintubation (7.3% for PWH versus 8.3%; P = 0.7) (Table 2).
Adjusted analyses showed that HIV was not significantly associated with either 90-day [Fig. 2, Table 3: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for HIV 1.3, 95% CI 0.6-2.7], 30-day mortality (Table 3; AOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.9) or any major complication (AOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.4). Confirmatory analyses using IPW methods also did not demonstrate any significant associations between HIV infection and adverse short-term surgical outcomes. We also performed analyses limited to PWH evaluating the association of preoperative characteristics and short-term outcomes; no baseline characteristics (including HIV-related variables) were predictive of any adverse outcome in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses (data not otherwise shown).
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
