
Dose Response for Starting and Stopping HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis for Men Who Have Sex With Men



Download the PDF here
PrEP Dosing Required to Achieve and Maintain Intracellular Drug Concentrations
"In summary, this study indicates that approximately 1 week of daily PrEP is expected to confer high PrEP activity for MSM. Although a high level of protection may persist for several days after stopping PrEP from steady state, 4 weeks of continued PrEP dosing is reasonable relative to the last potential HIV exposure."
Clin Infect Dis. (2015)
First published online: November 18, 2014
Abstract
Background.This study estimated the number of daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) doses required to achieve and maintain (after discontinuation) intracellular drug concentrations that protect against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection for men who have sex with men (MSM).
Methods.Tenofovir diphosphate (TFVDP) concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and rectal mononuclear cells from an intensive pharmacokinetic study ("CellPrEP" [preexposure prophylaxis]) of 30 days of daily TDF/FTC followed by 30 days off drug were evaluated. A regression formula for HIV risk reduction derived from PBMCs collected in the preexposure prophylaxis initiative study was used to calculate inferred risk reduction. The time required to reach steady state for TFVDP in rectal mononuclear cells was also determined.
Results.Twentyone HIVuninfected adults participated in CellPrEP. The inferred HIV risk reduction, based on PBMC TFVDP concentration, reached 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69%100%) after 5 daily doses, and remained >90% for 7 days after stopping drug from steadystate conditions. The proportion of participants reaching the 90% effective concentration (EC90) was 77% after 5 doses and 89% after 7 doses. The percentage of steady state for natural log [TFVDP] in rectal mononuclear cells was 88% (95% CI, 66%94%) after 5 doses and 94% (95% CI, 78%98%) after 7 doses.
Conclusions.High PrEP activity for MSM was achieved by approximately 1 week of daily dosing. Although effective intracellular drug concentrations persist for several days after stopping PrEP, a reasonable recommendation is to continue PrEP dosing for 4 weeks after the last potential HIV exposure, similar to recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis.
New human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections have increased among young minority men who have sex with men (MSM) in recent years [1]. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) provides an important tool for preventing HIV infection in MSM as well as heterosexual adults at risk for exposure to HIV [27]. Several guidelines for PrEP have been published; however, there is a lack of recommendations regarding how to start and stop PrEP relative to potential HIV exposures. Therefore, studies are needed that estimate the onset and duration of high PrEP activity (eg, >90% efficacy).
Knowledge of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile for PrEP is required to estimate the onset and duration of PrEP activity. Such information was generated using data from the preexposure prophylaxis initiative (iPrEx) trial, a large, randomized placebo controlled study that enrolled 2499 transgender women and MSM [8, 9]. A post hoc regression analysis identified a continuous relationship between HIV risk reduction (relative to placebo) and intracellular tenofovir diphosphate (TFVDP) concentration, the pharmacologically active moiety for tenofovir, in viable cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (vPBMCs). A benchmark in the continuous relationship was that a TFVDP concentration of 16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 328) fmol/106 cells was associated with a 90% reduction in HIV acquisition [10]; this was referred to as the EC90 (ie, the 90% effective concentration). The objective of the present study was to apply the regression formula derived from iPrEx to PBMC TFVDP concentrations from an intensive pharmacokinetic study in HIVuninfected persons (CellPrEP) to estimate HIV risk reduction per TDF/FTC dose.
DISCUSSION
This study evaluated pharmacokinetic data from daily dosing in CellPrEP with a pharmacodynamic model for HIV risk reduction from iPrEx, and calculated an inferred HIV risk reduction that reached 99% by 5 days of daily dosing. This 99% value provides an average estimate based on the set of TFVDP concentrations from CellPrEP participants for each daily dose, suggesting that most concentrations conferred nearly 100% efficacy from the fifth dose onward. Sensitivity analyses, including one in which data from female participants were excluded, showed consistent results.
A second, more conservative approach, showed that the majority of CellPrEP participants exceeded the iPrEx EC90 by the fifth or seventh doses, approximately 80% and 90%, respectively, and that the maximum proportion was achieved by the 13th dose (98%). Reaching the highest proportion by the 13th dose was consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of TFVDP in PBMCs, which demonstrated that >90% steady state was achieved after approximately 12 doses (Figure 3). FTCTP in PBMCs achieved steady state more rapidly92% after 5 doses and 97% after 7 doses.
A third approach focused on TFVDP (ln transformed) at an important site of action in MSM, in rectal mononuclear cells, showing that 88% and 94% of steady state were achieved after 5 and 7 doses, respectively (Figure 2). FTCTP concentrations in rectal mononuclear cells also appeared to reach steady state by this time.
Taken together, a high level of PrEP activity was achieved by 57 doses, indicating that, for optimal benefit, PrEP should be started approximately 1 week before it is needed. It is important to note that this analysis was based on data in MSM (iPrEx), so these results should not be extrapolated to women, heterosexual men, or other routes of transmission. Understanding and applying PK/PD analyses for PrEP in women, and populations other than MSM, is an urgent research priority.
Other studies also support approximately 1 week of leadin time for starting PrEP in MSM. The HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 066 study, which used directly observed dosing for 5 weeks to characterize TFVDP and FTCTP in PBMCs among 45 HIVuninfected men and women, showed that steady state was achieved by 7 days for both TFVDP and FTCTP [12]. An advantage of HPTN 066 compared with CellPrEP was the directly observed dosing design. Reaching steady state by 7 days indicates that inferred HIV risk reduction and proportion above the iPrEx EC90 would plateau by day 7. Another study with consistent results was the iPrEx Open Label Extension, which showed that no HIV infections were observed in MSM when PrEP dosing was estimated to be ≥4 doses per week (HIV risk reduction, 100% [95% CI, 84%100%]) [13], corresponding to greater than foursevenths (57%) of steadystate concentrations. This level of steady state (57%) would be achieved in the present study after 4 doses using TFVDP kinetics in PBMCs and 2 doses in rectal mononuclear cells. Finally, the Ipergay study evaluated placebo vs 2 TDF/FTC tablets before anticipated sex followed by 1 tablet 24 and 48 hours after sex among MSM [14]. An unblinded analysis by the data safety monitoring board showed that a significant reduction in HIV incidence (magnitude not reported) was observed in the TDF/FTC vs placebo group. Together these observations support high PrEP activity by approximately 1 week for MSM [15].
The considerations for how to safely stop PrEP after the last potential HIV exposure are not as straightforward. The present study found that high PrEP activity was evident for several days after dosing was stopped. The inferred risk reduction exceeded 90% for 7 days, and 80% of participants remained above the iPrEx EC90 for 2 days after stopping PrEP. However, an important consideration for discontinuing PrEP is how long it takes for HIV to be completely cleared from the body following the last potential exposure. There appears to be little consensus on this issue given that several variables may affect the HIV clearance process, such as whether HIV is endocytosed into Langerhans cells (where it may persist for days), and/or adhered to follicular dendritic cells, and/or whether early cycles of HIV replication occur [16, 17]. As early stages of viral replication occur, longer times are required to completely clear the virus, and the chance for establishing latent infection increases. This was demonstrated in early postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) studies in animals that showed 50% vs 100% efficacy for 10 days vs 28 days of tenofovir dosing when started 24 hours after intravenous simian immunodeficiency virus exposure [16]. These considerations underlie the current PEP recommendations to treat potential HIV exposures for 28 days [18].
PrEP differs from PEP in that early replication is presumably blocked by PrEP, as long as PrEP activity is high, perhaps allowing for a faster HIV clearance rate in the setting of PrEP. Similar efficacy was found in animal studies that compared continued PrEP dosing for 28 days after the last viral inoculation vs discontinued dosing after the last viral inoculation [19]. These considerations suggest that shorter durations of dosing might be adequate for PrEP following the last potential HIV exposure, but not enough information is available to make specific recommendations. This should be an area of future research. Until then, a conservative recommendation would be to continue dosing for 4 weeks after the last potential HIV exposure.
The strengths of this study include the several lines of evidence used to estimate PrEP efficacy for each daily dose, including use of a PK/PD model from iPrEx to analyze drug concentrations from an intensive pharmacokinetic study, CellPrEP, with all drug concentrations processed and assayed with the same laboratory procedures; analysis of drug accumulation at an important site of action for MSM; and the consistency of the findings from this study with other studies. The main limitations include that the onset and duration of action could not be studied directly in vivo, and that these results were based upon studies in MSM, so the findings cannot be extrapolated to other modes of transmission such as vaginal, penile (heterosexual), or parenteral.
Additionally, other HIV transmission characteristics may be important to the PK/PD profile, but were not considered here, such as the viral inoculum size [20]. Last, adherence in CellPrEP was monitored using selfreport and pill count, which may not have accurately reflected true dosetaking behavior among participants [21].
In summary, this study indicates that approximately 1 week of daily PrEP is expected to confer high PrEP activity for MSM. Although a high level of protection may persist for several days after stopping PrEP from steady state, 4 weeks of continued PrEP dosing is reasonable relative to the last potential HIV exposure.
METHODS
Intensive Pharmacokinetic Study Design
CellPrEP was a prospective, observational, pharmacokinetic study in HIVuninfected adult male and female volunteers aged 1855 years, conducted at the University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01040091). The study was approved by the institutional review board and participants provided written informed consent prior to participating. Subjects received daily TDF 300 mg/FTC 200 mg (as Truvada) for 30 days, followed by 30 days off drug; the total study duration was 60 days.
PBMCs were collected on days 1, 3, 7, 20, 30, 35, 45, and 60. On days 1 and 30, blood was collected at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24hour intervals postdose; on days 3, 7, and 20, blood was collected predose and at 2 and 8 hours postdose. Subjects were asked to fast overnight, beginning at 10 pm, prior to their dosing visits (days 130). Rectal biopsy samples were collected once for each subject at 2 hours postdose at one of their dosing visits. These collections were staggered such that 4 participants had the rectal biopsy for each of the 5 dosing visits (days 1, 3, 7, 20, and 30). For the washout phase, blood was collected on days 35, 45, and 60. A window of several days was allowed around all scheduled visits. Adherence was determined by pill count, selfreport, and a dosing calendar on which participants recorded dosing times.
Freshly Lysed PBMC Processing
PBMCs were harvested from cell preparation tubes with standard laboratory procedures. Red blood cells (RBCs) were lysed with RBC lysis buffer followed by rinsing and automated cell counting (Countess, Invitrogen). Cells were lysed in 500 μL methanol:water (MeOH:H2O) and stored at 80°C until analysis.
Viable Cryopreserved PBMC Processing
At the day 7 visit, a vPBMC sample was collected along with the freshly lysed PBMC sample (as described above) at the predose time point. The vPBMC sample was processed using a freezing solution of Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI), fetal bovine serum, and dimethyl sulfoxide, and the viable cells were stored at 80°C until processing for the assay. Just prior to assaying, the frozen PBMC samples were thawed and processed with the same procedures that were described previously for the iPrEx analysis [8, 10].
Rectal Mononuclear Cell Isolation
Approximately 20 pinches of rectal tissue were collected by a gastroenterologist during sigmoidoscopy from 4 to 12 inches into the rectum using a 3mm forceps. Biopsies were placed into 30 mL of phosphatebuffered saline and washed with complete RPMI, followed by 23 digestions with Collagenase solution at 37°C for 30 minutes, with gentle agitation. The cell suspension was collected by straining the digested solution through a cell strainer. After RBC lysis, the remaining mononuclear cells were washed, counted, assessed for viability, lysed in 500 μL of MeOH:H2O, and stored at 80°C until analysis.
Drug Assay
TFVDP and emtricitabinetriphosphate (FTCTP) concentrations in lysed cellular matrices were assayed with a validated liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry method, as described previously [11]. The lower limit of quantification (LOQ) was 2.5 fmol/sample for TFVDP and 0.1 pmol/sample for FTCTP. This was the same analytical procedure used previously to assay iPrEx samples [8].
Pharmacokinetic Analysis
All TFVDP and FTCTP concentrations in PBMCs from all visits in all participants were used for the pharmacokinetic model. The pharmacokinetic concentrationtime profiles for each individual were characterized using a 1compartment constant drug input model with Phoenix WinNonlin. Rectal mononuclear cell concentrations were characterized with the same model using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California) with least squares regression, but using a naivepooled approach.
Data Analysis
Freshly lysed PBMC TFVDP concentrations from CellPrEP were converted to vPBMC values for use in the iPrEx regression formula [10], because the iPrEx regression formula was generated using TFVDP from vPBMC, and the samples from CellPrEP were freshly lysed PBMCs. Multiple imputation was used for inferring the TFVDP values in vPBMCs. The multiple imputation used data from 65 paired viablefresh values, including some from HIVinfected individuals. Each predicted viable cryopreserved TFVDP value was the result of 20 imputations that accounted for variability. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using multiple imputation with the following reduced datasets for viablefresh values: removing values from viable cryopreserved samples in shortterm storage (≤3 months), removing values from HIVinfected persons, removing values from women in CellPrEP, and removing values from those in CellPrEP with known missed doses. Finally, the raw TFVDP concentrations in vPBMC from the day 7 visit of CellPrEP were directly applied to the iPrEx regression formula (n = 20). These TFVDP results corresponded to the predose concentration on days 5, 6, or 7, depending on when the participant came in during their day 7 visit window. This included 1 vPBMC result that showed no signal for TFVDP (or FTCTP) despite a high value in the freshly lysed sample (greater than the 75th percentile of freshly lysed values). A TFVDP value of "0" was included for this sample.
The mean log vPBMC values were modeled using a linear mixed effects model with a cubic spline fit to days since starting daily TDF/FTC. Three approaches were used to estimate the onset and duration of PrEP activity. First, the inferred HIV risk reduction was calculated using estimated TFVDP concentrations (in vPBMCs) from CellPrEP and analyzed with a previously described regression equation from iPrEx [10], for each dose of daily TDF/FTC, as well as each day after TDF/FTC dosing was stopped. Second, the proportion of CellPrEP individuals with TFVDP concentrations greater than or equal to the iPrEx EC90 (16 fmol/106 vPBMCs) was determined over the same time frame. Finally, to evaluate corresponding drug concentrations at an important site of drug action in MSM, the time that TFVDP concentrations reached steady state in rectal mononuclear cells was determined.
RESULTS
Subject Characteristics
Twentyone HIVuninfected men and women were enrolled in CellPrEP, and 19 completed all study visits. Of the 2 participants who did not complete all study visits, 1 had grade II low phosphorus and was removed from the study per protocol, while the other participant chose to withdraw for personal reasons. Nineteen rectal samples were collected and analyzed from 19 participants, and 410 PBMC samples were analyzed from 21 participants. The demographics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. A total of 5 missed doses (out of 584 doses) were reported by participants in the study, supported by pill counts, indicating an overall adherence of 99%.
Inferred HIV Risk Reduction
The inferred HIV risk reduction based on PBMC TFVDP concentration was 77% (95% CI, 40%93%) after 1 dose, 96% (95% CI, 60%100%) after 3 doses, 99% (95% CI, 69%100%) after 5 doses, and 99% (95% CI, 70%100%) after 7 doses (Figure 1).
The inferred risk reduction did not reach 100% during the study. The corresponding inferred risk reduction from the sensitivity analyses ranged from 75% to 81% after 1 dose, 95% to 97% after 3 doses, and 98% to 99% after 5 and 7 doses. Analysis of the raw TFVDP concentrations from the day 7 visit (predose from doses 5, 6, or 7), with and without the sample with no drug detection, revealed a 92% and 96% risk reduction, respectively. After dosing was discontinued at day 30, the inferred risk reduction remained >90% for 7 days. In sensitivity analyses, after stopping drug for 7 days from day 30, the risk reduction ranged from 90% to 94%.
Proportion Above the iPrEx EC90
The proportion of PBMC TFVDP concentrations that reached the iPrEx EC90 was 30% after 1 dose, 55% after 3 doses, 77% after 5 doses, 89% after 7 doses, and 98% after the 13th dose (Figure 1). The proportion reaching the iPrEx EC90 did not reach or exceed 99% during the study. The corresponding values from the sensitivity analyses ranged from 26% to 41% after 1 dose, 53% to 67% after 3 doses, 78% to 85% after 5 doses, 91% to 95% after 7 doses, and 99% after the 13th dose. Analysis of the raw TFVDP concentrations from the day 7 visit (predose from doses 5, 6, or 7), with and without the sample with no drug detection, revealed 85% and 89% above the iPrEx EC90, respectively. After stopping drug, 80% of TFVDP concentrations remained above the iPrEx EC90 for 2 days, decreasing to 48% at 7 days postdrug discontinuation. In sensitivity analyses, the proportion of concentrations above the EC90 ranged from 86% to 91% at 2 days after stopping drug, and 48% to 63% at 7 days after stopping drug.
Rectal Mononuclear Cell Concentrations
Seventeen of the 19 rectal samples had quantifiable TFVDP concentrations, whereas 2 samples had concentrations below the LOQ, both from the firstdose visit. One of the 19 FTCTP concentrations was below the LOQ, from the day 3 visit. A value midway between 0 and the lower LOQ was used for these concentrations in all calculations. TFVDP concentrations were natural log (ln) transformed prior to fitting the pharmacokinetic model (Figure 2). The halflife of rectal mononuclear cell TFVDP (ln) was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.23.2) days and the steadystate concentration (ln) was 7.6 (95% CI, 6.88.4) fmol/106cells, corresponding to 1961 (95% CI, 8544501) fmol/106cells after backtransformation. The halflife based on this model predicted that 71% (95% CI, 48%82%) of steadystate was reached after 3 doses, 88% (95% CI, 66%94%) after 5 doses, and 94% (95% CI, 78%98%) after 7 doses. The steadystate FTCTP concentration in rectal mononuclear cells was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.531.4) pmol/106cells, but the halflife could not be accurately estimated (1.5 [95% CI, 0.5∞] days) (Figure 2).
PBMC Pharmacokinetics
The 2 participants who withdrew early were not included in the pharmacokinetic modeling for PBMCs, but their data were included in the inferred risk reduction analyses described above. Using the concentrations from dosing visits, the mean TFVDP steadystate concentration was 103 fmol/106cells (coefficient of variation [CV], 32%) and the mean halflife was 3.5 days (CV, 31%) in the 19 participants who completed all study visits (Figure 3). Eighteen percent of steadystate was achieved after 1 dose, 45% after 3 doses, 63% after 5 doses, 75% after 7 doses, and >90% after 12 doses. The mean FTCTP steadystate concentration was 6 pmol/106cells (CV, 22%) and the mean halflife was 33 hours (CV, 42%) (Figure 3). Forty percent of steady state was achieved after 1 dose, 78% after 3 doses, 92% after 5 doses, and 97% after 7 doses. There were no differences between men and women in steadystate TFVDP (P = .46) or FTCTP (P = .69) concentrations.






