data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b66/93b66d3437dec4cd383e548998ae220e44f6204a" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b66/93b66d3437dec4cd383e548998ae220e44f6204a" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b66/93b66d3437dec4cd383e548998ae220e44f6204a" alt="" |
|
Pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine and lopinavir/ritonavir
|
|
|
Reported by Jules Levin
ICAAC Sept 11-15 2009 San Francisco
Monika Scholler-Gyure,1 Thomas N Kakuda,2 Sophie H Akuma,1 Inge De Clerq,1 Goedele De Smedt,1 Kurt Spittaels,1 Katrien Janssen,1 Veerle Vyncke,1 Richard MW Hoetelmans1
1Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium; 2Tibotec Inc., Yardley, PA, USA
AUTHOR CONCLUSIONS
ETR had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of LPV and RTV
When co-administered with the Meltrex formulation of LPV/r, ETR PK parameters decreased by 30-45%
The effect of the Meltrex formulation of LPV/r on ETR is comparable to that seen with DRV/r7
- efficacy and safety of ETR in the presence of DRV/r was demonstrated in DUET-1 and DUET-24
Co-administration of ETR and LPV/r was generally safe and well tolerated
ETR can be co-administered with LPV/r without dose adjustments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2e63/d2e635f12307410844d000937d25c8b2afbd034b" alt="image002.gif"
ABSTRACT
Background
Etravirine (ETR; TMC125) is a next-generation NNRTI with demonstrated activity in treatment-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients. A previous interaction trial in HIV-negative volunteers demonstrated increased ETR exposure when co administered with lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r; RTV) (soft-gel formulation). This study re-evaluated the pharmacokinetics of ETR and LPV/r when LPV/r was administered as the Meltrex formulation.
Methods
Open-label, randomized, two-way, two-period crossover trial. ETR 200mg bid was given for 8 days. After 14 days washout, LPV/r 400/100mg bid was administered for 16 days; ETR 200mg bid was co-administered on Days 9-16. Steady-state pharmacokinetics were assessed over 12 hours for ETR, LPV and RTV alone and when co-administered. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were obtained by non-compartmental analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed.
Results
Sixteen volunteers participated (11 male/five female). PK results are given below (Table 1).
Table 1. Mean (± SD) PK parameters for ETR and LPV alone and co-administered
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c32/14c326de7a8dbac78880cd3c229d36871178d176" alt="image004.gif"
RTV pharmacokinetics were unchanged. The most frequent adverse event (AE) was headache in six volunteers (grade 1). One grade 3 increase of triglycerides was reported during co-administration.
Conclusions
In contrast to the results of the study performed with the soft-gel LPV/r, co-administration of ETR with LPV/r (Meltrex) resulted in a 30-45% decrease in ETR pharmacokinetics. The decrease of LPV PK parameters by 13-20% when combined with ETR is similar to earlier reported data and is not considered clinically relevant. Given that the effect of LPV/r on ETR pharmacokinetics is comparable to the effect of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) on ETR pharmacokinetics shown in previous trials, which demonstrated favorable ETR efficacy and safety, ETR and LPV/r can be co-administered without dose adjustments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed5e2/ed5e2078e69092f6c84727a6b90ca48f0895568e" alt="image006.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d2be/4d2bee3a4db0bcd7d560647b116b32ded7d5b765" alt="image008.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a968e/a968e242c4d22346a0bcb100bde5009f9bf34a53" alt="image010.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c7a7/5c7a72245c47e9fdc78eb62e5923aec37e345fea" alt="image012.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d16b/3d16bbd37348322007607f332334154a9e743815" alt="image014.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a800/8a8002f6f95b4313e10000ff9383fa46ad230791" alt="image016.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/082c1/082c142f93301c950c251b91f02f9890a1c4b171" alt="image018.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893c9/893c93f1750f5a7fc4753a265c73cc28cea19b00" alt="image020.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a2d/d2a2dc0e094465f5d77f2bcf39dac6e57aae87d7" alt="image022.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a70f2/a70f2a4755340f6eb0888a0e5f0a4ee78ee3441b" alt="image024.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a21fa/a21fa1e075e863f09cf88fc374e15cef621a94f2" alt="image026.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce27a/ce27aa52428c93ca8d9acab17031b7bbee7ce05b" alt="image028.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac9a0/ac9a07faded0c61789fc60e0c43ef30f27c5e6a7" alt="image030.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96e33/96e3326529bead2645ad15d19eac0a0c55d0074f" alt="image032.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b41c5/b41c51af13b48fc5a4de3260a04f742b2fdce8e2" alt="image034.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/273ed/273edb4b0a2a38269a218d39f20a41fd50eeef96" alt="image036.gif"
REFERENCES
1. Vingerhoets J, et al. J Virol 2005;79:12773-82.
2. Madruga JV, et al. Lancet 2007;370:29-38.
3. Lazzarin A, et al. Lancet 2007;370:39-48.
4. Mills A, et al. IAS 2009. Abstract MOPEB036.
5. Yeh RF, et al. JAIDS 2006;42:52-60.
6. Piscitelli S, et al. ICAAC 2002. Abstract A-1824.
7. Scholler-Gyure M, et al. Antiviral Ther 2007;12:789-96.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b66/93b66d3437dec4cd383e548998ae220e44f6204a" alt="" |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93b66/93b66d3437dec4cd383e548998ae220e44f6204a" alt="" |
|
|